Archive

ShareThis Page
Border statistics posted on web, then removed | TribLIVE.com
News

Border statistics posted on web, then removed

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, November 8, 2014 12:01 a.m

Most of the people whom the Border Patrol stopped from sneaking into the country last year were from countries other than Mexico, according to agency statistics, a shift that might have provided fodder for politicians leading up to Tuesday’s election.

But they didn’t get much of a chance. The annual report was posted on the Customs and Border Protection website for about five hours on Oct. 10, then taken down.

Now some are questioning whether that decision was an example of the Obama administration playing politics with public information.

Even before Tuesday, the administration said it was waiting until after the midterm elections to deal with immigration reform so that any losses would not be blamed on the Democrats’ proposal. For some, removing the apprehension statistics, which both parties could use to criticize immigration laws, was another flatly political move.

“It worries me that they may have been taken down for purely political reasons,” said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah. “If the information is ready it should be made available. The idea that it was and then yanked down for political reasons is outrageous.”

Customs and Border Protection spokesman Christopher O’Neil wrote in an email that the decision to remove the briefly released data had nothing to do with the midterm elections.

Rather, he said, it was an effort to provide all of the agency’s statistics — and not just the Border Patrol’s — “in one concise and comprehensive package.”

He said the agency had intended to publish the data by Oct. 31. But administrative delays in gathering statistics by operational elements caused the date to be delayed several days. Customs and Border Protection now plans to publish before Nov. 15, he wrote. The early release, he said, was because of miscommunication.

“Someone got ahead of us, and then, someone else gave them to a reporter (without) coordinating with us,” he wrote, adding that in past years, the agency didn’t release statistics until well after January for the previous fiscal year. “No conspiracy, no politics, just good governance.”

The fact that the Border Patrol caught mostly foreign nationals not from Mexico might be an anomaly, but it underscores the border’s changing dynamics. The federal government still faces challenges in understanding and planning for who may be trying to enter the country without authorization.

Victor Manjarrez, a retired Border Patrol chief in Tucson, said the numbers can be interpreted — and exploited — different ways, depending on the political party.

Many Border Patrol chiefs continue to feel “an incredible amount of pressure,” said Manjarrez, now the associate director of the National Center for Border Security and Immigration, a research group at the University of Texas, El Paso. “The fear is timing. If this was next year, it wouldn’t be a big deal.”

Since the 2014 fiscal year ended Sept. 30, bits and pieces of the annual statistics have dribbled out. The data show mixed results for the Obama administration, which has touted that its border apprehensions, largely from Mexico, remain near the lowest level in decades.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson spoke about the number of Southwest border apprehensions in a speech at a Washington think tank on the state of border security shortly after the 2014 fiscal year ended.

Using slides to illustrate his remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies on Oct. 9, Johnson announced that the Border Patrol had made 479,377 apprehensions last year on the Southwest border. He saluted Customs and Border Protection for recently making public an internal report and new policy on the agency’s use of force. And he underscored “a commitment to transparency.”

“There is much more we can do to inform the public about our border security efforts on their behalf,” Johnson said.

And yet, the new annual statistics were pulled off the Customs and Border Protection Web site within hours of being posted the following day.

The agency has kept posted data relating to the surge of unaccompanied minors from Central America caught at the border, which was a driving factor in the spike in so-called Other than Mexican apprehensions in 2014.

But the full data set, obtained by the Center for Investigative Reporting, shows a mixed bag. Apprehensions at the Southwest border have increased for the past three years. Yet border deaths fell to the lowest level since 1999. A majority of migrants — 252,600, or about 53 percent — caught at the Southwest border in 2014 were not Mexican. In contrast, a decade ago, Mexicans accounted for 93 percent of apprehensions, according to government statistics.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.