Archive

ShareThis Page
Boss says Elizabeth M captain ignored orders | TribLIVE.com
News

Boss says Elizabeth M captain ignored orders

PITTSBURGH -…A towboat captain involved in a barge accident that killed at least three crewmen disregarded an order to have a “helper” vessel accompany him as he pushed six coal barges up the Ohio River in turbulent conditions Jan. 9, his employer said Monday.

Donald Grimm, president of Campbell Transportation Co., testified at a Coast Guard inquiry that Elizabeth M Capt. George “Toby” Zappone left the company’s docks in Georgetown, Beaver County, about 10 p.m. Jan. 8, while boat assigned to assist because of high water and strong currents was still being fueled.

That boat, the Richard C, did not leave until about midnight.

Grimm read aloud the written orders that the Richard C assist with the barge transport. He said he had not spoken with Zappone about starting the trip without help.

“It was the captain’s decision” to leave, said Grimm, whose company is based in Dunlevy. “I believe there were some errors in judgment.”

Grimm was the first witness to testify in a week of hearings about the accident, which killed Tom Fisher, 25, of New Cumberland, W.Va.; Edward Crevda, 22, of West Brownsville, Washington County; and Scott Stewart, 36, of Elm Grove, W.Va.

Rick Conklin, 40, of Crucible, Greene County, is missing and presumed to be dead.

Zappone is scheduled to testify today, and the two other survivors are to testify Wednesday.

Zappone’s lawyer, Frederick W. Thieman, declined comment on Grimm’s testimony.

Grimm said the boat captain decides whether conditions are safe to be on the river, and Zappone consulted with other towboat captains and Campbell officials on the morning of Jan. 8.

Grimm said Zappone “was comfortable with the orders” for moving the coal barges from Georgetown to Braddock with the help of the Richard C.

“It’s his ultimate decision even to begin the voyage,” Grimm said, adding that refusing to go because of the weather would carry no ramifications for the captain.

Grimm described Zappone as a captain with 20 years’ experience and no record of poor decisions.

The boat was swept over the Montgomery dam in Industry, Beaver County, about 2 a.m. Jan. 9 after its six barges broke loose and the Elizabeth M tried to keep them from going over the dam. The 12 mph river current, four times faster than normal, pushed the boat and three barges over the dam. The boat has yet to be removed.

Grimm said many of the company’s towboats were not traveling that day, and crews were monitoring tied-off barges to make sure they were not swept away in the swift current. Two other Campbell towboats, however, went through the Montgomery lock that day, he said.

Grimm said that because of the conditions, the company reduced – by at least half – the size of the tow the Elizabeth M was transporting that day. He said the Richard C was supposed to be with the Elizabeth M the entire trip.

Grimm also testified about an “outdraft” – a current pushing barges toward the middle of the river – just above the Montgomery lock and dam. He said Zappone would have been aware of it.

With the speed of that day’s current, “it would have been a tremendous outdraft,” he said.

Grimm said the Coast Guard gave no warning to suggest the river was not navigable the day of the crash.

Grimm testified that the crew of the Elizabeth M contacted company mechanics Jan. 7 and 8 to request maintenance on the boat’s steering system, but he said the problem was routine, not critical. The work was not done before the accident.

Coast Guard Lt. Cmdr. Michael Kelly, chairman of the hearings, said the purpose is to gather information about the crash. Afterward, he will write a report on his findings and could recommend changes to river traffic procedures or possibly criminal charges if he finds negligence.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.