ShareThis Page
Bouncer charged on forensic evidence |

Bouncer charged on forensic evidence

The Associated Press
| Friday, March 24, 2006 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK – A bouncer pleaded not guilty Thursday in the gruesome rape and murder of a graduate student in a “CSI”-style case built on forensic evidence such as blood, rabbit fur, rug fibers and cell phone records.

Darryl Littlejohn, 41, was charged in the slaying of Imette St. Guillen, a 24-year-old student at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in Manhattan.

Brooklyn prosecutors have “never seen a case where there has been so much forensic evidence as the foundation of a case,” said District Attorney Charles Hynes.

Littlejohn, a parolee with a long criminal history, has steadfastly denied any involvement in the slaying.

St. Guillen’s body was found dumped in a desolate section of Brooklyn on Feb. 25. A white athletic sock was stuffed in her mouth and her head was wrapped with packing tape.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.