ShareThis Page
Boy’s transplant success offers hope |

Boy’s transplant success offers hope

| Saturday, December 25, 2004 12:00 a.m

Sickle cell disease is a painful and life-threatening genetic condition that affects about 70,000 people in the United States and more than 600 Pittsburgh-area residents, most of whom are black.

Healthy red blood cells are round and jelly-like, squeezing easily through even the smallest capillaries in the body.

In sickle cell sufferers, however, red blood cells become misshapen because they contain an abnormal type of hemoglobin, the protein that delivers oxygen from the air in the lungs to all parts of the body. These deformed cells are hard and crescent-shaped, like sickles used to cut wheat.

One in eight black Americans carries a single copy of the gene for sickle hemoglobin, which likely evolved as a defense against malaria. Carrying one copy of the gene does not cause health problems. But if two carriers like Sarah and Anthony Jones, of Indiana, Indiana County, have a child, there’s a 25 percent chance that the child will inherit the disease.

“At first we thought, ‘What did we do to our child?'” said Sarah Jones, whose youngest son, Austin, 6, was born with sickle cell disease. “Then we quickly realized that we needed to be thinking instead about what we could do for our child.”

Sickle-shaped blood cells block small blood vessels, depriving tissue and organs of an adequate oxygen supply. This can cause lung and spleen damage, severe anemia, episodes of excruciating pain, kidney failure and stroke.

People with sickle cell disease often rely on heavy-duty narcotics for pain relief and frequently must receive blood transfusions to improve their circulation. Most do not live past their mid-40s.

Transplanting bone marrow — the body’s blood-making factory — of a healthy person is the only way to cure sickle cell disease. But bone marrow transplants carry their own dangers and are only offered to sickle cell patients in the most serious cases.

Patients must be treated with massive doses of chemotherapy to kill off their own defective bone marrow and take hard-to-tolerate immunosuppressant drugs to stave off rejection of the transplanted cells.

Worldwide, only about 210 sickle cell patients — and fewer than 70 in the United States — have undergone bone marrow transplants for sickle cell disease because of the high risk of potentially deadly fever and infection, said Dr. Lakshmanan Krishnamurti, a hematologist at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh. Transplant can be fatal in 5 percent of cases and fail to cure the disease in another 10 percent, Krishnamurti said.

But these odds are improving.

Five years ago, Krishnamurti became the first physician in the world to perform an innovative new transplant protocol intended to prevent complications from occurring in sickle cell patients.

The procedure uses gentler doses of chemotherapy so the patient’s own bone marrow is weakened, not destroyed. This minimizes the toxic side effects of the transplant, but requires higher doses of immunosuppressant drugs to prevent rejection.

Roughly 20 reduced-intensity transplants like this have been attempted worldwide, Krishnamurti said.

This procedure appears to have cured Austin Jones of his severe form of sickle cell disease. And since Austin’s surgery last July, Krishnamurti has performed reduced-intensity bone marrow transplants on two more sickle cell patients, one child and one adult. Early results are promising, he said.

“I’m thrilled,” Krishnamurti said. “What we’ve learned by treating Austin we could use to treat people who wouldn’t otherwise qualify for transplant. That’s where the real excitement is.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.