Braddock Mayor Fetterman charged during UPMC protest |

Braddock Mayor Fetterman charged during UPMC protest

Tom Fontaine

Pittsburgh police today charged Braddock Mayor John Fetterman with trespassing because they say he refused to leave private property during a Downtown protest.

Police said Fetterman, 41, was protesting the closing and razing of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center’s Braddock hospital outside the U.S. Steel Tower.

Fetterman, however, told the Tribune-Review that “it’s too late to save the hospital. It has giant gaping holes in the side of it” from demolition work.

Fetterman said he staged a one-man rally to urge UPMC to establish urgent care in Braddock that is available 12 hours a day, 7 days a week.

“It was a plea, that UPMC open up the same quality of urgent care as they have in communities like Shadyside or Robinson,” Fetterman said.

UPMC expanded hours at its Braddock Family Health Center, but it’s open from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. only on Tuesdays through Fridays. It has shorter hours on Mondays and Saturdays, and is not open on Sundays.

Authorities were called about 10:30 a.m. when Fetterman refused orders from building security to leave the plaza area near the entrance, according to a criminal complaint. Police said they told Fetterman he could protest on a nearby sidewalk, but he refused.

Fetterman was handcuffed and led to nearby police cars, where officers wrote him up for defiant trespassing, a misdemeanor, and then released him.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.