ShareThis Page
Break up the Nationals |

Break up the Nationals

The Associated Press
| Monday, April 18, 2005 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON — Over and over during spring training, Frank Robinson would tell anyone who would listen: If his Washington Nationals could do all the little things the right way, they could compete with any team.

No big boppers or Cy Young Award winners on this roster, Robinson would say, almost boasting. Can’t count on three-run homers or shutouts. Nope, but with key hits, defense and pitching, these Nationals could be more than merely ex-Expos.

And he was saying it again Sunday after the Nationals’ 7-3 victory over Arizona completed a series sweep, stretched their winning streak to five games and improved their NL East-leading record to 8-4.

“We have to chip away and do the little things to get a run in,” Robinson said. “Right now we’re doing a lot of things right.”

Eight starters produced at least one hit; only slumping Cristian Guzman didn’t, but even he contributed an RBI with a bases-loaded walk. Four players drove in runs. The bullpen and sparkling defense got out of a first-and-third, none-out jam in the seventh — perhaps not coincidentally, the same inning in which the Nationals sent 11 batters to the plate and scored six runs without the benefit of a homer.

“It’s a great team ‘W,”‘ Jose Vidro said. “Everybody put a little something there.”

He had two hits in the seventh, including a two-run single, and drove in Washington’s first run with a sacrifice fly in the fourth.

The capital’s first major-league team in 34 years is having a grand ol’ time and so are its fans. Yesterday’s crowd of 35,463 followed those of 45,596 for the home opener Thursday, and 34,943 on Saturday. That’s 116,002 for three games — or more than one-seventh of what the Expos totaled for 81 home dates in Montreal and Puerto Rico last season.

“When I look at the stands and see everybody jumping up and down, it’s incredible,” said Vidro, the team’s longest-tenured player. “I looked at that and said, ‘This is beautiful.”‘

The 2004 Expos (67-95) pulled off only three sweeps of three-game series — and twice the opponent was an Arizona club that went 51-111. Montreal only had one winning streak all season longer than the Nationals’ current one.

Such stretches are indeed built on “little things,” as Washington demonstrated in each half of the seventh yesterday.

Starter Esteban Loaiza (three no-decisions) allowed three runs on eight hits and worked his way in and out of trouble: Diamondbacks leadoff hitter Craig Counsell had three hits, including a two-run single in the second, but was stranded each time.

With Arizona up 3-1 in the seventh and runners on the corners, Robinson removed Loaiza. In came Joe Horgan, whose two-seam fastball got Luis Gonzalez to slap a grounder to Guzman. The shortstop looked the runner on third back to the bag, then stepped on second for one out and threw to first for another.

“That’s huge,” Robinson said. “It really picked up the team, and it may have taken a little heart out of the Diamondbacks.”

Horgan’s day was done after two pitches, and T.J. Tucker (1-0) got the win by facing just one batter, too: Troy Glaus, who flied out.

“We have to do that every time — hold them right down, and let the offense do their job,” Tucker said.

That it did, breaking out with a big seventh inning for the second game in a row: On Saturday, the Nationals’ seven-run seventh fueled a 9-3 win. Neither outburst included a homer.

As Arizona starter Brad Halsey (six-plus innings, three runs) put it: “It’s definitely a good lineup. They are tough all the way through.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.