Bridge repair limits access |

Bridge repair limits access

James Musta isn’t looking forward to carrying groceries over a footbridge or having to cross the span to put the garbage out.

But that’s what the 32-year-old Moon resident and his Thorn Hollow Drive neighbors will be forced to do for a month while township workers replace the rusted-out, two-lane bridge that connects their homes to the outside world.

“Everybody’s wondering why it’s going to take so long,” said Musta, who lives at the end of Thorn Hollow just outside of Coraopolis. “You can build a house in a month. This bridge ain’t nothing.

“What are we going to do about our mail, newspaper delivery, everything?”

The 18-year-old bridge spans 18 feet over Thorn Run Creek. Moon Manager Greg Smith said township workers about a week ago were clearing debris from under the bridge in anticipation of heavy rain from the remnants of Hurricane Isabel when they discovered the bridge’s steel had rusted out.

Because Thorn Hollow is a dead end, a footbridge that will be built will be the only access to about 20 homes on the opposite side of the bridge during construction, Smith said. The distance from the start of the bridge to Musta’s home at the far end of Thorn Hollow is three-tenths of a mile.

There is no way to create another access to the area, he said.

“It will be an inconvenience, no doubt about it,” Smith said.

Residents of the area include an 80-year-old man who uses a walker and has a home nurse and several others who are elderly or ill, Musta said. Bob Zimmerman Sr., 62, has serious heart problems, his son, Bob Jr., 29, said.

Zimmerman Jr. worries that it will take ambulance crews longer to reach the area on foot. Ambulances are called to the area four to five times a year for an older couple with health problems, he said.

“Most of the time when my dad has trouble he rides it out,” Zimmerman Jr. said. “It’s not really my concern, but I’m sure some of the other neighbors have thought about it.”

The township will save as much as $140,000 by having its own road department build the new bridge instead of hiring a private contractor, Smith said. It is estimated to cost about $20,400, compared to the $125,000 to $160,000 it could cost if the work was contracted.

Smith could not say when work would begin, but said the township will move quickly.

Smith said he has discussed emergency preparations with the township’s police and fire departments and Valley Ambulance. The fire department will leave a truck at the end of the street during construction, Smith said. A representative of Valley Ambulance could not be reached for comment.

Musta said he and his neighbors are also worried about the security of their cars, which they’ll have to leave parked before the bridge.

Police Capt. Leo McCarthy said the department will provide “dramatic increased patrols.”

“We’ll do our best to keep an eye on the place,” McCarthy said.

While Smith said the township only recently discovered the bridge’s deteriorated condition, Musta, who has lived on the road for 15 years, said it has been in bad shape for a long time. Zimmerman Jr., who lives four doors up from the bridge, said the bridge rattles and shakes loudly.

“The garbage trucks won’t come across it no more. They’ve been sending pickup trucks up there,” he said.

But Zimmerman Sr. said he understands that the bridge, the surface of which is a steel plate, needs to be replaced.

“It was a thick plate at one time, but it ain’t no more. It’s worn out,” he said. “They have to do it. It was only a matter of when and how long it will take.”

Smith said the new bridge will be better than the old one, with a concrete deck instead of steel, and should last about 40 years.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.