ShareThis Page
Bright lines |

Bright lines

| Tuesday, December 7, 2010 12:00 a.m

Trib readers react to the letter ” Condoms a non-moral solution ” (Dec. 1 and, in which board-certified infectious diseases physician Amesh A. Adalja of Butler addresses a recent statement by Pope Benedict XVI:

Annamarie Liptak , North Huntingdon — It is extremely unfortunate that Dr. Adalja does not understand the differences between morality and practicality. He states that morality is a guide for living one’s life. The Catholic Church would agree.

Catholics turn to the church for this guidance based on the teachings of Jesus Christ. Is Dr. Adalja suggesting that we all just make our own lists of right and wrong and follow those as we see fit?

He also states that morality is not a recipe to gain admission into some mythical realm. Again, I think the church would agree. Catholics believe that the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ have gained us the privilege of living eternity with the God who created us and loves us.

We follow the moral guidelines of the church to the best of our abilities to show love and honor to God and to each other. I would think Dr. Adalja would be grateful that the pope did acknowledge that the use of condoms is a sign of the desire for one human being to not harm another. It would be more practical to take this small point of agreement than to demand a total reversal by the church.

Kris Sanders, Squirrel Hill — Clearly, Amesh Adalja rejects the Catholic belief in papal infallibility, but does he believe in condom infallibility• Promoting such a belief in condoms can actually enable the spread of AIDS by conveying a false sense of security in high-risk behavior.

Indeed, I’d like to ask him: How likely is it for those who practice abstinence outside marriage and fidelity within marriage to get AIDS• And if these behaviors are the true AIDS-preventers, why disparage the church for promoting them?

In his widely mischaracterized remarks, Pope Benedict actually reiterated the church’s opposition to the use of condoms and said that the real and moral solution to AIDS is a “humanization of sexuality.” Benedict is preaching respect for, and confidence in, our God-given human capacity to exercise self-mastery and achieve true love, and those who dismiss all this as a myth are actually denigrating our human nature.

Board-certified pediatric physician Brian W. Donnelly, Gibsonia — Amesh Adalja falsely claims that the Catholic Church is recognizing the “crucial role that condoms play in halting transmission of HIV.” Unfortunately for Adalja, the pope’s statement on condom usage and male prostitutes was hypothetical and taken out of context.

By analogy, if a man is going to rob a bank and intends to use a gun, the church would argue that he should use an unloaded gun. This would minimize the risk of endangering innocent life. That position does not mean the church condones robbing a bank.

The church’s position on condom use, like its position on robbing banks, has not changed. In fact, the church’s position on both the male prostitute and the bank robber would be: “Dude, get a real job!”

The Catholic Church maintains that sexual relations outside of marriage are immoral and that chastity (with a failure rate of 0 percent) needs to be the weapon that wins this war.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.