ShareThis Page
British may be coming-out party for McIlroy |

British may be coming-out party for McIlroy

The Los Angeles Times
| Monday, July 13, 2009 12:00 a.m

LUSS, Scotland — Around noon Saturday in a golf dreamland by a sapphire lake, a teenage boy’s mouth went agape, and clearly the world had made another of its patented accelerations.

Walking by the ropes from the No. 9 tee box toward the No. 8 green at the Scottish Open, the boy suddenly found himself striding right past a young man not so much older who headed opposite, whereupon the younger face lit up because by now, already, it’s possible to feel gobsmacked just by the sight of 20-year-old Rory McIlroy.

As they ready the greens and the gristle stands down along Scotland’s west coast for the 138th British Open this week in Turnberry, it’s a bit breakneck to fathom that in the 136th, or just a few minutes ago, McIlroy turned up at Carnoustie as an 18-year-old amateur, embarked with a bogey-less 68 on Thursday and said, “I’m knackered.”

He told of Holywood, his Northern Ireland hometown near Belfast, how everybody knows everybody at the Holywood Golf Club, how at 7 he watched Tiger Woods win the 1996 U.S. Amateur and everything became “Tiger-Tiger-Tiger,” how the ovations at Carnoustie gave him “just a chill down the back of my spine.”

He finished 42nd, won the silver medal as low amateur, won playing partner Scott Verplank’s praise as somebody who looked “14” but played “28,” won an upbraiding from his father for hurling a club on No. 11, and eyeballed a vacation in Dubai that promised the joys of indoor snow skiing.

Well, low amateurs can come and go rather vaporously, but look now: McIlroy dwells for a sixth month in the top 20 of the world, stirs a hullabaloo of hope for even this British Open so soon, has become famous enough that some drunk Scot rants on a shuttle bus that the lad needs a haircut, and feels such overwhelming discomfort with the expectations that he said this:

“It’s going to be my third major as a professional, and I’ve done well in the majors this year. I’ve been pleased with my results. I had a 20th at the Masters and finished 10th at the U.S. Open. If I can keep this progression, hopefully it will mean a first next week. I feel as if I’m playing well enough.”

Well, then, three majors, 20th, 10th, first, sure, why not• The planet’s speeding up again and the raves pour in from golf experts who realize ages such as 19 and 20 just aren’t all that young anymore.

Geoff Ogilvy went for “by far the best young player I’ve ever played with.” Padraig Harrington chose “already at the very top.” Just this week, Ian Poulter told reporters on Thursday, “Give him a couple of years, and he will be seriously troubling Mr. Woods.” Just last winter, Mark O’Meara famously chose the ever-popular “better than Tiger was at 19” to describe McIlroy’s ball-striking. Paul Casey remembered first seeing McIlroy at 17 and remembered “the best player I’ve ever seen at that age.” Ogilvy persisted with “feasible he’s going to be top two or three in the world within a year.” To have Gary Player say, “And what a beautiful swing,” must qualify as some form of poetry.

And then, Eldrick T. Woods, in March: “He has all the components to be the best player in the world, there’s no doubt,” which on these islands seemed to count as sort of its own No. 1 ranking.

Along the way, absolutely everybody extols his demeanor and his I-belong-here carriage on the course.

Besides, he already has endured the long, uphill slog of learning how to win on a Sunday. It took him an eternal 21 weeks from Sept. 7 when he fumbled a four-shot lead at the European Masters to Feb. 1 when he held off Justin Rose at Dubai to claim his first European Tour title.

He said that it got “a monkey off my back.”

So throngs follow him and glimpse the white cap with “RORS” stitched on the back, the willful hair that rebels out the sides of it, the St. Bernard club-head cover (a dog aficionado, he used to own a St. Bernard), and the swing that causes mass cooing and earned the unbeatable description “syrupy” from the Belfast sportswriter Jack Magowan. Throw in that for the Scottish Open, McIlroy decks out daily in tartan trousers and reels off the various styles for the various days — “So I’ve got … a MacGillivray tartan, a Loch Lomond tartan, a Forever Scotland tartan (purple-based, evidently), and I’ve got a McDonald’s tartan, as well” — and you have what you call pleased masses.

British Open facts & figures

Event: 138th British Open

Dates: July 16-19

Site: Turnberry (Ailsa Course)

The course: Turnberry originally was designed by 1883 British Open champion Willie Fernie. The course essentially was lost during World War II when the Royal Air Force Coastal Command turned it into an air base from which planes protected shipping convoys. With the war over, Philip Mackenzie Ross redesigned the Ailsa Course from scratch and it reopened in 1951. It did not host its first Open until 1977, and this will be only the fourth time the British Open is played there.

Length: 7,204 yards

Par: 35-35—70

Prize money: 4.2 million British pounds ($6.8 million)

Winner’s share: 750,000 pounds ($1.2 million)

Defending champion: Padraig Harrington

Last time at Turnberry: Nick Price finished birdie-eagle-par and closed with a 4-under 66 to beat Jesper Parnevik by one shot. The signature shot for Price was a 50-foot eagle putt on the 17th. The signature moment for Parnevik was failing to look at the leaderboard. He thought he needed a birdie on the final hole and wound up making bogey.

Open champions at Turnberry: Tom Watson (1977), Greg Norman (1986), Nick Price (1994)

Key statistic: All three British Open champions at Turnberry are in the World Golf Hall of Fame.

Noteworthy: For the first time since 2004, Tiger Woods does not currently hold any of the major titles.

Television (all times): Thursday-Friday, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., TNT Sports. Saturday, 7-9 a.m., TNT Sports; 9 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., ABC Sports. Sunday, 6-8 a.m., TNT Sports; 8 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., ABC Sports.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.