ShareThis Page
Bryant’s status still unclear for WVU |

Bryant’s status still unclear for WVU

| Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:00 a.m

West Virginia coach Bob Huggins said he will determine sophomore point guard Darryl “Truck” Bryant’s availability for Saturday’s national semifinal against Duke after watching him practice today and Wednesday.

Bryant, who suffered a broken foot last week that caused him to miss NCAA Tournament games against Kentucky and Washington, is getting fitted for a specially designed shoe.

“I don’t have any idea (if he will play),” Huggins said Monday during a teleconference with reporters. “We really won’t know until we see what he can do and see how he progresses.”

The Mountaineers didn’t practice yesterday, two days after defeating Kentucky, 73-66, in the East Regional final.

Junior Joe Mazzulla, Bryant’s replacement, scored a career-high 17 points against Kentucky. It was his first start of the season.

Bryant’s possible return would add more depth to the backcourt, returning a key player to the rotation.

“I just know that with this, there was a chance he could play,” Huggins said. “For Truck’s sake, and I think for the rest of our guys, we’re going to explore every opportunity.”

Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski said he’s preparing his players for Bryant’s return.

“Who starts or not, we have to be ready for both (Mazzulla and Bryant) of these young men to play,” Krzyzewski said. “Sometimes, when a kid has been out, the team becomes better. And then, he comes back, and they’ve gone up a notch as a team.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.