ShareThis Page
Bucs fail to sweep Marlins |

Bucs fail to sweep Marlins

| Friday, June 3, 2005 12:00 a.m

The way Dontrelle Willis has pitched this season, a team is fortunate to get one crack at beating the Florida Marlins’ 23-year-old phenom.

The Pirates had their chance in the eighth inning Thursday night, and one swing of the bat worked against them in a 6-3 loss that snapped their three-game winning streak.

Trailing by four runs, the Pirates scored once and had the bases loaded with two outs.

Willis, after issuing back-to-back walks to force in that run, clearly was teetering, and his major league-leading ninth victory suddenly was in jeopardy.

Michael Restovich, however, helped Willis’ cause by popping the first pitch he saw to short. Alex Gonzalez gloved the ball, the threat was averted and the Marlins were en route to breaking their nine-game losing streak at PNC Park.

Restovich realized the situation called for working the count. For seeing if Willis could find the plate after he had walked Jose Castillo on five pitches. But Restovich also had the green light to swing.

“If he came in with a fastball, I told myself, ‘It’s got to be there or nothing,'” Restovich said. “He threw it there, and I just missed it.”

It was the story of the night for the Pirates, who had nine hits and two walks in Willis’ eight innings, but could only muster three runs.

“In hindsight, second-guessing, yeah,” manager Lloyd McClendon said when asked whether Restovich should have taken the first pitch. “But the fact is he got a ball right down the middle of the plate. He just didn’t get on top of it.”

Despite his quirky leg kick and deceiving arsenal of pitches, Willis didn’t overpower the Pirates while improving his record to 9-2. His three strikeouts tied for his fewest in a start this season, and he had only one perfect inning. It also was just the third time an opponent scored three runs against him.

Willis was much more effective with the bat, hitting a crucial RBI single in the sixth inning, then adding a double and scoring a run in the eighth.

After giving up solo homers in the first and second innings, Pirates starter Dave Williams (5-5) was trailing just 2-1 in the sixth. It looked like the margin might stay that way when he quickly retired the first two batters.

But Damion Easley doubled to left, and the decision was made to intentionally walk Gonzalez. That pitted Williams against the left-handed hitting Willis.

Bad move.

Willis, one of the game’s better hitting pitchers, sprayed a single into right field that scored Easley.

It got worse.

Luis Castillo followed with a single to left that brought in Gonzalez for a 4-1 lead that would come in handy later.

McClendon realized what was at stake when he ordered the intentional walk.

“Willis is a complete athlete,” he said. “He certainly swings the bat with authority. He knows what he’s doing.”

Williams, though, was less complimentary of his mound opponent.

“He’s not Tony Gwynn,” he said. “But he definitely can hit for a pitcher.”

Williams was just as upset about the solo homers he served up to Carlos Delgado in the first and Easley in the second. It matched the number of homers he had allowed in his previous five starts and was the first time since April 24 he gave up two in a game.

“I let the team down early with those two homers,” he said.

Restovich also was willing to take his share of the blame.

“We fought back to get in a position to win,” he said. “I’d like to have come through.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.