ShareThis Page
Bucs find frustration in Philly |

Bucs find frustration in Philly

| Sunday, July 9, 2006 12:00 a.m

PHILADELPHIA — The beauty of the Pirates playing against the Philadelphia Phillies is not the baseball. It’s that one of these struggling National League teams must come away victorious.

The Pirates, who haven’t won consecutive games since completing a sweep of the San Francisco Giants on June 11, had a chance to duplicate that modest feat Saturday. But a four-run first inning paved the way for a 6-2 Phillies win at Citizens Bank Park.

The failure shouldn’t be surprising. Since sweeping the Giants, the Pirates have endured a 13-game losing streak, the worst in the franchise’s modern era dating to 1900, and have, generally, alternated wins and losses since snapping the historic run of defeats. The Pirates haven’t won a series since their stay in San Francisco.

Then again, these are not the 1927 Yankees re-incarnate that the Pirates were playing and losing to on this night. The Phillies last won a series June 5-7, taking three consecutive from Arizona. Since then, the Phillies have endured losing streaks of six and seven games and have fallen about a $50 cab ride behind the New York Mets in the NL East standings.

After the Phillies lost to the Pirates in the series opener Friday, manager Charlie Manuel had asked for help from the media in the form of prayer.

Either that, or perhaps, the unintentional batting practice thrown by Pirates starter Paul Maholm (3-8), who has lost four of his past five decisions, gave the Phillies a respite from their losing ways.

Maholm, the object of Jim Tracy’s praise before the game, when the Pirates manager had said of his young left-hander, “He has a lot of upside, trust me,” was touched early. The Phillies brought nine hitters to the plate in the first inning — one that began with a Jimmy Rollins groundout and ended with pitcher Cory Lidle lifting a fly ball to the warning track in left. In between, six Phillies singles accounted for four runs.

Maholm believed his stuff was good.

“I was throwing the pitches exactly where I wanted to, and they were getting them in the holes or flaring them into the outfield,” he said. “It’s one of those nights you just, I guess, tip your hat and figure out exactly what happened. I think the hardest hit ball in the first was Lidle, and it was caught.”

Chris Coste’s two-run single in the third, which boosted the Phillies’ lead to 6-1, was icing on that first-inning cake.

The Pirates, who had been among the NL’s best run-producers over their previous nine games, averaging 6.1 runs a game during that span, went quietly.

Offensive highlights were few for the Pirates.

Ronny Paulino singled home Jose Castillo from second base in the second inning.

Jose Bautista stole a base in the fifth, the Pirates’ first successful attempt since June 17. There had been only four attempts between that Jason Bay steal and Bautista’s effort last night.

Bay hit a solo homer to center in the sixth — his first since June 18.

The teams play again this afternoon. To the victor go the game and the series, a small uptick ahead of a three-day All-Star break.

“You always try to win series,” Tracy said. “It’s always meaningful. It doesn’t matter if it’s before the break,three weeks prior to it (or) three weeks after it.”

Additional Information:


Sunday’s game

Pirates (30-59) at Philadelphia Phillies (39-47)

1:35 p.m. · Citizens Bank Park

Probable starters : Pirates LHP Zach Duke (5-7, 5.01 ERA) vs. Phillies LHP Cole Hamels (1-4, 5.45 ERA)

TV/radio : FSN · KDKA-AM (1020) and the Pirates Radio Network

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.