Build or buy? North Fayette County Municipal Authority mulls options |

Build or buy? North Fayette County Municipal Authority mulls options

North Fayette County Municipal Authority agreed Tuesday night to begin negotiations with Coastal Lumber Co. to purchase an additional 58 acres in the Porter Hill area of Dunbar Borough that would be needed to construct a treatment plant or store bulk water.

Bob Softcheck, the authority’s manager, said the authority has not made a decision on which option will be selected.

“We’re still studying our options at this time,” Softcheck said.

Two weeks ago, the authority received cost estimates from Senate Engineering for building a water treatment plant or purchasing treated water from the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County.

The first option, which is constructing a 12-million-gallon-per-day treatment plant at Porter Hill, would cost an estimated $28.9 million. This option does not include the cost of financing, which would vary depending on the amount of grant money received and the interest rates for loans or bond issues.

The second option calls for the authority to purchase treated water from the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County at a cost of $1.15 per 1,000 gallons with a 5-cent increase every five years.

The Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County has indicated in preliminary talks that it would absorb most of the initial construction costs. If future expenses occur through changes in regulations, the cost would be prorated for the North Fayette authority.

When various interest rates are taken into consideration, the cost of buying water from the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County appears to be less expensive for the first 20 years, according to information provided by engineers from Senate Engineering.

If a plant is constructed, the average household customer would see their water bills increase by $7.35 per month, officials said. The same customer would see an initial increase of $1.95 per month if North Fayette decides to purchase its water from the Westmoreland authority.

Ken Hillman, engineer for Senate Engineering, said he has contacted Coastal Lumber Co. to schedule a meeting to discuss purchasing the land at Porter Hill.

Hillman said Coastal Lumber Co. purchased 393 acres of land for $440,000 in 2004, according to records at the Fayette County Courthouse.

“They paid a little over $1,000 per acre,” he said. “This would be a very good deal if we could negotiate a similar price with Coastal Lumber.”

Cindy Ekas is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.