ShareThis Page
Building deficiencies at Donegal Elementary addressed |

Building deficiencies at Donegal Elementary addressed

| Saturday, November 1, 2008 12:00 a.m

Mt. Pleasant Area School District Superintendent Terry Struble addressed parents’ concerns regarding several building deficiencies at Donegal Elementary School but said a solution may not happen immediately due to the district’s feasibility study of all buildings, which will not be completed for several months.

At a meeting with parents this week, Struble outlined his “three points to school as I see it.”

He said the most important point, the whole reason for school, is academics.

“We’ve worked hard to exceed state standards,” he said.

The school will soon receive its fourth consecutive Keystone Achievement Award. The state award recognizes schools for meeting adequate yearly progress under No Child Left Behind. Struble said innovative programs in reading, math, social studies and science help ensure achievement by making sure “kids are involved.”

Athletics and activities are also vital, Struble said. “They keep the kids enticed.” He said very few children involved in extracurricular activities get in trouble and “they learn to manage their time. They know their homework needs to get done before the activities.”

Struble’s third point involves both staff and buildings, the “experience your kids have when they come to school, teachers who care about them, staff who know their names, the heat is working, because for some kids, school is the warmest place they will be in all day, food is available and they feel this is their safe spot.”

He said that 30 percent or more of the district’s children rely on school as the most caring place for them to be.

“I truly believe when they walk through the doors of our schools they have someone who cares about them and where they feel safe,” he said. “Our kids need somebody to show them there’s somebody who cares. A lot of our kids don’t get that at home.”

Part of the caring, Struble said, involves the appearance of the school, both inside and out. “It should be clean, comfortable, incorporates arts in all ways — music, art on the walls, the structure — it’s a special place. To me, curb appeal is everything. It creates a setting for a child that they’re somewhere special.”

Struble said his goal is to “achieve all three things.”

Parent Joy Brady asked about leaks, drips and exposed wires.

“We’re concerned and hope we’re near the top of the list. It was $169,000 for Norvelt’s new roof. We have the nicest elementary gym in the district, and we want to keep it that way,” she said.

She added that the skylight in the sixth grade hallway has been covered for years, leaving the hallway gloomy.

Parent Sheri Temple said parents and teachers are “concerned about the carpet in the kindergarten room. I’ve been told it hasn’t been replaced in 26 years.”

Struble said he had no reports of mold in the carpet but personally opposes carpets in schools because they are hard to keep clean.

Struble said the board took a bus tour of all the district’s buildings and is concerned about Donegal. He said two elementary roofs “are beyond repairs. Yours held up better this weekend than Rumbaugh’s. We started a feasibility study to see what needs to be done.”

He said the study, which is being performed by HHSDR Architects, Sharon, is examining all options for the district’s schools. “We need to know what we can afford and what we cannot afford. It might be a year or a year and a half for feasibility study options to begin. You still need a roof. We need to move to a point that by spring we have a direction.”

The board will have to select and approve an option or options for renovations or other changes in the district once it receives the feasibility study. “Every conceivable recommendation is on the table,” Struble said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.