ShareThis Page
Burglary arrest made |

Burglary arrest made

Bob Stiles
| Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:00 a.m

An Indiana County man faces a preliminary hearing next week on allegations that he took tools during a break-in at the county fire academy.

Gregory D. Baker, 39, of Black Lick, is scheduled to appear Tuesday before Magisterial District Judge Susanne Steffee, of Homer City, on charges of burglary, theft, criminal mischief and institutional vandalism.

State police at Indiana allege that sometime Friday or Saturday, Baker took hand and power tools from the fire academy in Center Township. He also is charged with damaging doors and windows.

Baker was caught trying to sell items taken during the burglary at an area resale shop, according to police. He admitted his involvement in a written confession, they said.

Academy officials were continuing to determine yesterday exactly what was taken.

“We don’t have a complete list yet. Because of the amount of equipment, it’s hard to tell what’s there and not there,” said Tom Stutzman, fire academy director.

“There are three windows that need to be replaced and some access doors to three different buildings.”

Court documents list the value of the stolen tools at a minimum of $600 and the damage at $500.

After his arraignment, Baker was jailed in lieu of $2,500 bail.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.