ShareThis Page
Burglary suspect flees from police on frozen river |

Burglary suspect flees from police on frozen river

Jonathan Szish
| Sunday, February 16, 2003 12:00 a.m

A man wanted for questioning in a burglary sought asylum from police Saturday in a place as chilly as it was conspicuous — on the half-frozen Allegheny River.

After two hours on the ice, Shawn Oden, 32, of New Kensington, surrendered to Plum police just before 7 p.m. New Kensington police said they will charge Oden with burglary and fleeing police.

Police said they sought Oden for questioning at mid-afternoon yesterday in New Kensington, along Industrial Boulevard. Oden fled, eventually leaping onto a barge docked on the Allegheny. He then jumped onto the ice, trekking at least a mile with a growing phalanx of police and firefighters in tow.

Oden is a suspect in a robbery earlier yesterday at a home in the 1200 block of Woodmont Avenue, New Kensington, police said. Two shotguns, a stereo and a videocassette recorder and a Sony PlayStation were stolen, police said. Oden later was spotted selling a television outside Superior Used Tire, near where the chase began, police said.

During most of the pursuit, Oden stood 50 yards out on the ice, yelling back at police who were trying to persuade him to come back to shore.

Police remained on Barking Road and in brush overlooking the river. Rescue crews were ready, just in case the ice gave way.

At one point, Oden’s grandmother grabbed a police bullhorn to coax him back to shore.

“I’d go out on the ice to scare him back in, but he doesn’t want to listen,” Dorothy Oden, of New Kensington, said.

Plum police Sgt. Lanny Conley said police gave Shawn Oden “a couple options, namely to be evaluated at Forbes Regional Hospital” in Monroeville.

New Kensington police said they haven’t yet recovered the shotguns or other items stolen from the Woodmont Avenue burglary.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.