ShareThis Page
Burned house familiar to police |

Burned house familiar to police

| Tuesday, August 5, 2003 12:00 a.m

A Penn Hills house destroyed by arson Friday was familiar territory to local police.

Nine reports, including a shooting, armed robberies, assaults and drug thefts, have been filed with Penn Hills police since last year.

The Fugitive Task Force of the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Department visited the house last week to serve a warrant on a woman they thought was staying there. By the end of the week, the home was in flames after an arsonist set fire to 150 tires stacked next to the wooden-frame structure.

Robert Liberto and Donna Gessley had been living in the home, which is valued at $26,300 and owned by George Donald and Virginia Beldham, according to the county reassessment Web site.

Mark Farabaugh, 33, was shot at the home in October in what police suspect was a dispute over money. Farabaugh survived.

Warrants have been issued against the suspect in the shooting, Anthony Murray, 22, formerly of Penn Hills, who is in jail in Ohio awaiting trial on kidnapping charges, Penn Hills police Lt. Dennis Poland said.

Code enforcement officials cited Liberto and Gessley two weeks ago over the stacks of tires in the yard. About 200 more tires in the basement went up in flames with the house.

Penn Hills Fire Marshal Jack Mason said he spent much of Monday conducting interviews in the arson case. He said he has suspects in the case.

“I plan to meet with police detectives as soon as possible to discuss the case and see if there is enough information to forward to the Allegheny County District Attorney to proceed with criminal charges,” he said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.