ShareThis Page
Burrell hoops star transferring to Plum |

Burrell hoops star transferring to Plum

| Saturday, July 2, 2005 12:00 a.m

High school basketball standout Dylan Grazier, Burrell’s leading scorer last season, is in the process of transferring to Plum.

Grazier averaged 16.9 points per game and sank 51 3-pointers in 23 games for Class AA Burrell in 2004-05.

Grazier, who will be a senior, is moving with his family into the Plum School District.

He is expected to play basketball and possibly football at Class AAAA Plum.

“The biggest thing he can help us with is a little leadership,” Plum basketball coach Ron Richards said.

“We lost a lot of seniors. We’re a fairly young team. It seems like he’s the kind of kid who fits in, and everybody likes him.”

Grazier could not be reached for comment.

Entering last season, Gazier was battling for the starting quarterback job at Burrell. An early-season injury, however, limited his playing time.

Grazier wound up completing 10 of 16 passes for 258 yards and two touchdowns.

However, the basketball court is where he could make his greatest impact.

Grazier, a 6-foot-1 guard/forward, will bring experience and good perimeter shooting to Plum.

He was held below double figures in points only twice, and was named a Valley News Dispatch second team all-star last season.

“He’s a fairly multidimensional player,” Richards said. “He’s a solid high school athlete.”

Grazier could help fill the shoes of graduated sharpshooter Mike McKee, a Division I Kent State recruit.

Last season, Burrell finished 8-6 in Section 1-AA and 13-10 overall. Plum finished 7-7 in Section 2-AAAA and 16-8 overall. Both teams missed the WPIAL playoffs.

In football, Grazier played quarterback and outside linebacker last year, but it’s not hard to imagine him playing another athletic position such as wide receiver.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.