ShareThis Page
Burrell puts brakes on field trips |

Burrell puts brakes on field trips

| Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:00 a.m

Burrell School Board, citing safety concerns as their impetus, plans to pass a measure that would limit school field trips to three school days and keep them inside the United States.

“Just in light of the climate in the world right now, we think it’s best that school authorized trips remain in the United States,” Superintendent Amy Palermo said.

Palermo said she presented the request to the board based on problems with the trips in the recent past. In some instances, trips were planned up to six months in advance before parents or teachers cancelled at the last minute.

“We’re just not going to be in that position right now,” Palermo said.

In recent years, students in the district only have gone to Montreal, Canada.

Palermo said that parents and teachers have voiced concerns about the health and safety of the students in light of such things as the events of Sept. 11 and the outbreak of the SARS virus.

Organizing the proper documentation for each student and dealing with border checks also has been a problem, she said.

Palermo said that money and discipline issues are not factors in the decision and that the board will revisit the issue annually.

Board President Andrew Kish said he has no concerns that students won’t be able to broaden their horizons by not being able to leave the country in a school-sponsored trip.

“There are a lot of things you can see in the United States to get an educational experience,” he said.

As for the trips being limited to three school days, Kish said, “They’re in school for an education. We felt that it was one of the important things and we don’t want them out of school.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.