ShareThis Page
Bus 7 spoils Highlands’ otherwise smooth ride |

Bus 7 spoils Highlands’ otherwise smooth ride

Tom Yerace
| Friday, September 2, 2011 12:00 a.m

School officials promised that the busing system’s performance would improve after a chaotic, delay-ridden first day Wednesday.

It did — but not by much — for the third-, fourth- and fifth-graders traveling from Grandview Upper Elementary School in Tarentum to Fairmount Elementary in Brackenridge, where parents waited to pick them up.

That journey, less than 1 1/2 miles, took an hour and 20 minutes Wednesday.

Thursday it took almost 50 minutes, but parents were just as irate and frustrated.

Students are dismissed from Grandview around 3:30 p.m. and supposed to arrive at Fairmount at 3:40 p.m.

At 3:50 p.m. parents and younger siblings were getting restless as they waited under a hot sun. Pat Graczyk, assistant to Superintendent Joseph Latess, was on hand to help with any problems at Fairmount. He made a call to Grandview.

“They left five minutes ago,” Graczyk reported. “They should be here at any time.”

But at 4:05 p.m., Larry Chifulini of Brackenridge, who was waiting for his granddaughter, a fifth-grader at Grandview, said, “This is unacceptable.”

“Yesterday, it was 10 (minutes) to 4,” he said. “Nobody knew what was going on. That was the problem.”

Asked how her daughter, a fifth-grader, responded to the delay on Wednesday, Holly Pukal of Brackenridge said, “Mad, disgusted, didn’t want to ride the bus.”

She said her daughter was apprehensive about it Thursday morning but Pukal told her they were going to give it another chance.

“I said ‘Hannah, it has to be better than yesterday,'” Pukal said.

“We have no idea where our kids are right now,” said an angry Jeff Thimons, husband of school board member Laura Thimons, and father of a fourth-grader.

At 4:18 p.m., Bus 7 finally pulled up to the curb at Fairmount, only a few minutes after one man, angered by the situation, had confronted Graczyk, using some obscenities. Graczyk asked him to stop because young children were nearby, but the man continued to use them until Graczyk threatened to call the police.

After conferring with the bus driver, Graczyk told the parents who were waiting for an explanation that teachers were on board the buses Thursday to help things go smoother, and the teacher aboard Bus 7 would not allow the driver to leave each of the five stops until he had done a head count.

Graczyk said that slowed everything down, but it was done to make sure that students were getting off at the right stops.

“If we didn’t do that, it probably takes 10 minutes,” he said, “but I would rather err on the side of caution.”

Overall, Latess said the transportation situation was “98 percent improved,” with the exception of Bus 7.

“We’re not taking it lightly,” Latess said of that delay. “We’re meeting again tomorrow with the bus company, and we’ll get it straightened out.”

“It really was much improved,” he said. “It will be better tomorrow and by next week the kids should all be in a routine and it will be a lot easier.”

William Roenigk, head of the W.L. Roenigk Inc. bus company, was not available for comment, according to an unidentified woman who answered the business’ phone.

For the parents, it’s a wait-and-see proposition — not only regarding the busing problems but the school realignment the district put in place this year that made the busing changes necessary.

“They should have just let well enough alone,” said Derek Ruediger of Brackenridge as he waited for his son, Dominic, a fifth-grader. “This can’t be saving them money. I had friends of mine who lost their jobs because of (realignment).”

George Sosnick of Harrison, whose daughter is a fifth-grader, said, “It’s going to be a lot quicker for me to go down there (Grandview) and pick her up.”

“I still don’t see what this realignment is saving the district,” said Jim Watts of Brackenridge, another Grandview parent. “I’ll give them a few more days. I’ll try to be patient.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.