Bush blasts Iran’s nuclear program |

Bush blasts Iran’s nuclear program

WASHINGTON — President Bush turned the screws on Iran on Thursday, saying the Islamic Republic faces “universal condemnation if they continue with a nuclear weapons program.”

Iran has insisted its nuclear program is only for peaceful energy purposes. But the Bush administration earlier this month succeeded in persuading the International Atomic Energy Agency to demand that Iran provide an explanation of its nuclear program by Oct. 31.

The president said he had raised his concerns about Iran’s nuclear program this week with world leaders attending the United Nations General Assembly.

“I’ll tell you, the response was very positive,” Bush said. “People understand the danger of the Iranians having a nuclear weapons program.”

He added that he planned to discuss Iran with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who arrives today at Camp David for two days of talks. Russia is helping to build a nuclear reactor in Iran, and U.S. officials are concerned the Russian help is aiding Iran in a possible weapons program.

Bush’s harsh remarks were made on the same day that the Iranian foreign minister, in an interview published in The Washington Post, signaled a willingness to cooperate on the nuclear issue. “We don’t have anything to hide because we do not have a program for producing nuclear weapons,” Kamal Kharrazi said. “Therefore we are ready to be quite transparent.”

Asked about Kharrazi’s comments, Secretary of State Colin Powell said, “I can be nothing but pleased if that’s what they intend to be and if that’s what they actually do.”

Meanwhile, diplomats reported yesterday that U.N. atomic experts have found traces of weapons-grade uranium at a second site in Iran. Experts for the IAEA, which earlier had discovered the substance at a plant in Natanz, found the substance at Kalay-e Electric Co., just west of Tehran.

A source familiar with the Sept. 18 report from the inspectors said the samples found at Kalay-e Electric were consistent with those found at Natanz.

David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, said the discovery could bolster the Iranian claim that the enriched uranium must have come into the country on imported components, since the materials were assembled in Kalay-e and then shipped to Natanz. But he noted the Iranians had already changed their story about the components, having earlier claimed they were produced in Iran without foreign assistance.

“It would have been very shocking of they had not found (highly enriched uranium) there,” Albright said. “But Iran has to prove its point that it did not enrich uranium at all.”

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the discovery was “part of a long-standing pattern of evasions and deception to disguise the true nature and purpose of Iran’s nuclear activities.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.