ShareThis Page
Bush: Success spurring attacks |

Bush: Success spurring attacks

The Associated Press
| Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON (AP) — Despite two days of audacious, deadly attacks, President Bush insisted Monday that the United States is making progress in Iraq and said American successes are actually spurring the violence by making insurgents more desperate.

But defense officials said the synchronized suicide bombings also suggested a new level of coordination by attackers, and Democrats scoffed at the president’s argument, leveling some of their sharpest criticism yet.

“Does the president really believe that suicide bombers are willing to strap explosives to their bodies because we’re restoring electricity and creating jobs for Iraqis?” said Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry, a White House candidate. “Is the president arguing that the better things get in Iraq, the more dangerous it will become for American soldiers?”

Bush met with U.S. Iraqi administrator L. Paul Bremer in the Oval Office to discuss the security situation on a day when suicide bombers struck the Red Cross headquarters and three police stations, killing nearly 40 people and injuring more than 200.

The president pledged to hunt down the “cold-blooded killers, terrorists” who are conducting the attacks. He expressed particular dismay that the attacks targeted Red Cross aid workers and police officers.

“They don’t care who they kill. They just want to kill,” Bush told reporters.

Also attending the White House meeting were the military commander in Iraq, Gen. John Abizaid; Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld; Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Richard Myers; and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.

“The more progress we make on the ground, the more free the Iraqis become, the more electricity is available, the more jobs are available, the more kids that are going to school, the more desperate these killers become,” Bush said.

“They can’t stand the thought of a free society. They hate freedom. They love terror. They love to try to create fear and chaos,” Bush said.

Bremer added that “a lot of wonderful things have happened” in Iraq: The country has a functioning Cabinet, all schools and hospitals are open and electricity has returned to prewar levels.

“We’ll have rough days, such as we’ve had the last couple of days,” Bremer said. “But the overall thrust is in the right direction.”

But the quadruple attacks in Baghdad complicated the White House effort to paint Iraq as a country where life is returning to normal. The bombings plunged parts of the capital into chaos, leaving scenes of broken, bloody bodies and twisted, burning automobiles.

Democratic presidential candidates said the surge in violence only bolstered their contention that postwar Iraq is a mess.

“I just don’t understand the president’s logic — that because there is more violence and more deaths, things are going well. In my book, that means things are worse,” Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean told The Associated Press.

Said Kerry, a Vietnam War veteran: This sounds frighteningly like the ‘light at the end of the tunnel’ rhetoric of Vietnam. Every day, the White House’s excuses become more insulting to our troops on the ground.”

Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut Democrat, said in New Hampshire that he was “startled” by Bush’s words. “With all respect, it makes no sense: This is a tragedy that occurred today, and it’s amid growing signs of dangerous disorder in Iraq.”

The bombings came hours after clashes around Baghdad killed three U.S. soldiers overnight, and a day after insurgents hit a hotel full of U.S. occupation officials with rockets, killing a U.S. lieutenant colonel and wounding 18 other people. The Pentagon identified the officer as Army Lt. Col. Charles H. Buehring, 40, of Fayetteville, N.C.

Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz was in the hotel but was not hurt.

Since Bush declared an end to major combat in Iraq six months ago, 113 U.S. soldiers have been killed by hostile fire, and about 1,675 have been injured in hostilities. American forces sustain an average of 26 attacks a day.

Bush sidestepped questions about who is behind the attacks.

Pentagon officials said they believed loyalists of ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein were responsible for the bombings. Top Iraqi and U.S. officers blamed “foreign fighters” for the day’s mayhem. White House spokesman Scott McClellan pointed to a third class of possible culprits: the criminals Saddam released from Iraqi prisons as he was losing his grip on power.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.