ShareThis Page
Butler County wife killer seeks new trial |

Butler County wife killer seeks new trial

Chuck Biedka
| Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:00 a.m

A former Buffalo Township man is waiting to learn whether a judge will give him a new trial or whether he will continue to serve a life sentence for murder.

Michael Ricksgers, now 54, was convicted of shooting his 31-year-old wife, Janet, to death on Dec. 26, 1993 in their trailer along Silverville Road.

At trial, Ricksgers’ legal team said he suffered from sleep apnea and accidentally shot his wife.

Janet Ricksgers was hit once in her back by a single .357-caliber bullet.

Michael Ricksgers was convicted of first-degree murder on Nov. 18, 1995, and has been in state prison since.

Through his new court-appointed attorney, Ricksgers is alleging that he didn’t have sufficient representation at trial and wasn’t told that prosecutors were offering a lesser charge if he pleaded guilty, said defense attorney Edith Lynn Sutton of Butler.

Butler County Judge William Shaffer is reviewing case documents and testimony from a July 21 hearing with evidence presented by Sutton and Butler County District Attorney Richard Goldinger.

Sutton now claims Ricksgers didn’t have a prior record and wouldn’t have shot his wife because he was previously divorced. “He knew he could have done that. He wouldn’t have shot her when he could have divorced her,” Sutton said.

Also, if Ricksgers had accepted a plea to third-degree murder, “he would already be out of prison,” she pointed out.

The district attorney said he had known Ricksgers’ legal team of Irv Green and Louis Ceraso of New Kensington. “He had good representation,” Goldinger said. Green and Ceraso have both died.

If Ricksgers’ appeal is denied by Judge Shaffer, Sutton said she will file an appeal to Superior Court.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.