ShareThis Page
Butler County woman gets probation, $5K fine for mislabeled cheese |

Butler County woman gets probation, $5K fine for mislabeled cheese

Matthew Santoni
| Tuesday, October 11, 2016 3:22 p.m

The cheese executive stood alone.

Michelle Myrter, 44, of Harmony, Butler County, was president or an executive at Slippery Rock-based Castle Cheese when two of its subsidiaries, Universal Cheese & Drying Inc. and International Packing LLC, sold a combination of Swiss, mozzarella and white cheddar cheeses falsely labeled as “100 percent” Parmesan and Romano cheeses between 2010 and 2013. The federal Food and Drug Administration said the cheeses also contained more of the anti-clumping ingredient cellulose — derived from wood pulp — than the 4 percent maximum allowed, though that was not formally made part of the final criminal information.

“I can’t change it. I take full responsibility for it,” Myrter told U.S. District Judge Mark Hornak on Tuesday at her sentencing. “I don’t know how to express the amount of sorrow I have for what transpired.”

Myrter pleaded guilty in February to a misdemeanor charge of introducing misbranded and adulterated food into the marketplace under a federal law that allows corporate officers to be held strictly liable for violations by their companies, regardless of whether they knew about the violations.

She also pleaded guilty on behalf of the two subsidiaries — which with Castle since have gone out of business — to conspiring to violate FDA regulations. She agreed to have the companies pay a total of $1 million in restitution and forfeitures as part of her plea.

Hornak sentenced Myrter to three years of probation, a $5,000 fine and 200 hours of community service at a food bank or similar program.

“The government didn’t believe it was sufficient for these two defunct companies to be held accountable alone,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Tonia Sulia Goodman said at Myrter’s sentencing hearing. “The fact that there may have been other people involved does not take away from the fact that this took place at a time when she held a position of responsibility.”

Defense attorney Stephen Stallings said the restitution of $500,000 from each of the subsidiaries was already in the process of being paid as the companies were liquidated. The official sentencing for each company was postponed to a later date.

Stallings said the misbranding charge stemmed from the fact that not all of the cheese was being aged and dried for the 10 months required by the FDA to be labeled “Parmesan cheese,” even if some of it originally had been chunks of cheaper cheeses.

“You can do that,” he said. “If it’s been aged 10 months and tastes like Parmesan, it’s Parmesan.”

He said the Castle Cheese case was unfairly lumped in with an ongoing national debate and civil lawsuits over the cellulose content of Parmesan cheeses and how it should be identified in the labeling.

Because of the accusations Castle and other companies had added “wood pulp” to their cheese, people had made death threats against Myrter — often in the comment sections of online articles, Stallings said.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-391-0927 or

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.