ShareThis Page
Buy me some peanuts and stadiums … |

Buy me some peanuts and stadiums …

| Friday, April 15, 2005 12:00 a.m

Another baseball season is upon us.

That means it’s time to check the stats in Forbes ‘ annual look at the always slightly fuzzy finances of Major League Baseball Inc., arguably America’s most taxpayer-enhanced sport.

This year, Forbes focuses on the Seattle Mariners, a small-market franchise that went a lousy 63 and 99 on the field last season but has quietly led the majors for five straight years in what counts most in pro sports — team profits.

The Mariners, says Forbes, are worth $414 million, which is fifth behind the mighty Yankees ($950 million), Red Sox ($563 million), Mets ($505 million) and Dodgers ($424 million). The poor Pirates’ market value is $218 million, or 25th in the league, with a decent 2004 operating income of $12.2 million on revenue of $109 million.

How can Seattle, the 20th-largest baseball market, be fourth in the average annual revenues over the past five years ($163 million)• How can it be fourth in attendance (3.3 million)• And how in the name of Barry Bonds has it averaged a gross profit of $17 million a year since 2000, when the Yankees lost $37 million last year?

Well, for one thing, the Mariners have a better-than-usual sweetheart stadium deal: Taxpayers paid 63 percent of the cost of Safeco Field’s $517 million price tag. Plus, the team runs the stadium and keeps all revenues, including an estimated $5 million to $8 million a year from graduations, proms and parties.

But a large part of Seattle’s success, says Forbes, is its Japanese connection.

Nintendo is a 54 percent owner of the Mariners. And it also forked over the money so the team could sign Japanese superstar Ichiro Suzuki, a 1.3 billion-yen-a-year ($12 million) singles hitter who has boosted attendance and made Seattle a prime U.S. destination for Japanese tourists.

As former Texas Rangers owner George W. Bush and former owners of the Reds, Indians, Brewers and A’s know, the best way to get rich with a small-market team is to sell it — preferably after getting local taxpayers to drive up its value by paying for a new ballpark.

But baseball’s gravy train might have left the station. Reason magazine, in “Demolishing Sports Welfare,” says two big court cases expected to be handed down this year “could bring the taxpayer-financed stadium-building boom of the past 15 years to a merciful halt.”

Of course, it’s a little late. According to Reason, the cost to taxpayers of subsidizing 66 major stadiums, ballparks and arenas between 1990 and 2003 was more than $10 billion.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.