ShareThis Page
Cal U volleyball coach leaving |

Cal U volleyball coach leaving

| Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:00 a.m

CALIFORNIA – California University has lost one of its more successful coaches.

Limin Jin, who posted an overall 91-48 record in four years with the volleyball team, has resigned to take the same post at Wayne State University in Detroit, Mich.

“We’ll miss him,” said California athletic director Tom Pucci. “He did an excellent job for us and left the program in good shape.”

A resident of Monessen, Jin took the Vulcans to the NCAA Division II championships two years ago.

The Vulcans went 27-11 in 2000, losing to unbeaten and eventual champion Hawaii Pacific, 3-0, in the semifinals at Sioux Falls, S.D.

Last season California went 19-15, including 5-5 in the PSAC, and lost in the Atlantic Region semifinal to eventual champion Lock Haven.

A native of Hangzhou, China, Jin was a volleyball standout at the University of Hangzhou.

He coached in China for three years before crossing the ocean and becoming a graduate assistant at the University of Kansas for two years.

Jin was an assistant at William and Mary College for four years before landing his first head coaching job at the University of Maryland-Eastern Shore. He was there for two seasons before taking the California post.

Jin will succeed Loretta Vogel, who resigned after going 32-54 in three seasons including 20-33 in the Great Lakes Intercollegiate Conference. The Warriors went 6-21 with a 2-15 league mark in 2001.

“We’ll have a nationwide search for a coach and hope to name someone in May,” said Pucci.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.