ShareThis Page
Calif. arts center models itself on local organization |

Calif. arts center models itself on local organization

Bob Karlovits
| Tuesday, October 5, 2004 12:00 a.m

Manchester Craftsmen’s Guild’s influence reaches across the country, as far as the California coast.

The guild provided the inspiration for San Francisco’s Bayview Hunters Point Center for Arts & Technology, which will hold its grand opening Wednesday.

“We’re starting out small, but the important thing is to show people what you can do day in and day out,” says Villy Wang, executive director and co-founder of the already thriving center.

Bill Strickland, chief executive officer and executive director of the guild and related Bidwell Training Center, says interest in his site’s post-secondary educational programs points “to a big need for better performances by schools and the needs of underserved kids in our cities.”

The opening of the Bayview center follows the creation of the Cincinnati Arts and Technology Center last fall, likewise shaped after the Manchester Guild. Strickland says the Guild does not have any control or financial interest in the other two, but will receive a fee of “about $50,000 a year” from each site for sharing technology and networking. He is dealing with interested groups in Grand Rapids, Mich., and Kansas City, Mo., as well.

Bayview is in a 5,000-square-foot space and already is offering programs in graphic arts, filmmaking and book publishing, Wang says.

“We weren’t the first to open, but we were the first that had the idea,” Wang says. Efforts to create the center began in 1996.

She expresses a desire to broaden the program constantly, even to get into the jazz presenting that the Guild does, but basically consigns her ambition to a “first-things-first” attitude.

“Bill has way more space than we do,” says Sue Sacks, chairwoman of Bayview’s board of directors. “But we’re trying to follow the history he has created.”

Strickland founded the Guild in 1968 and absorbed the Bidwell Training Center in 1972. The two programs in 1987 moved into a 62,000-square-foot headquarters. It is the home of educational programs teaching the arts and vocational skills, as well as a concert venue and recording program that has produced two Grammy Award-winning albums.

Plans for San Francisco’s $1.5 million Bayview center began in 1996, when Strickland gave a talk in San Francisco about the creation of the Manchester Craftsmen’s Guild. Willy Brown, who was mayor then, told Strickland, “I want one of those.”

The idea gained momentum the next year, when jazz pianist Herbie Hancock performed at the Guild and urged Strickland to spread his educational concept.

San Francisco planners were able to acquire land for the project but then found out it was contaminated. “After four years, the writing on the wall was that this would never get started,” Sacks says.

While a new site was sought, she says, the organization that became the Bayview center was being assembled. That led to Wang’s hiring two years ago. Wang left her career as a corporate lawyer to join the organization that eventually put together the San Francisco Jazz Festival. She was drawn by their arts-oriented, nonprofit work and became part of Bayview.

Wang says she sees the center as not only an educational site, but a venue that can change attitude in the racially mixed, blue-collar community.

“We want residents to be able to own the change when it happens,” she says.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.