ShareThis Page
California leads early, but falls to Monaca |

California leads early, but falls to Monaca

| Saturday, November 3, 2001 12:00 a.m

MONACA – Final scores can be misleading.

Take California’s 38-14 loss at unbeaten and top-seeded Monaca Friday in the opening round of the WPIAL Class A playoffs, for instance.

With a minute left in the first half, the underdog Trojans (5-4) were leading 14-7.

Monaca (10-0), however, scored two touchdowns in the final 53 seconds of the first half and California never recovered.

The loss was the fourth straight for California after opening with five wins under new coach Romaine Howell.

Monaca led 7-0 in the first quarter when Joel McDonald went over from two yards out for the first of his three touchdowns.

California went ahead when Ryan Robinson scored a pair of touchdowns on 35-yard runs within 5:15.

The Trojans threatened again when Robinson intercepted a pass and returned it to the Monaca 10, but an illegal block brought the ball back to the Monaca 44.

The Indians trimmed the margin to 14-13 with 53 seconds left in the half on Eric McPhilomy’s five yard run.

Ricky Schultz threw a four-yard touchdown pass to Andrae Carlisle with nine seconds remaining to put Monaca ahead to stay.

McPhilomy scored from five yards out for the lone touchdown in the third quarter, with McDonald running in from two and 20 yards out in the final period.

Robinson gained 105 yards on 15 carries to finish with 1,042 yards.

McPhilomy (142) and McDonald (104) both ran for more than 100 yards.

The Indians ended up outgaining the Trojans, 329-168.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.