ShareThis Page
Campaign season is time for unusual TV appearances |

Campaign season is time for unusual TV appearances

The Associated Press
| Monday, August 9, 2004 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK — Roland Martin reeled in a big one for his weekly fishing show on the Outdoor Life Network.

Baiting a hook beside him on a dock in Crawford, Texas, was President Bush, whose leisurely afternoon casting for bass was chronicled for “Fishing with Roland Martin” in an episode that first aired on Friday. (It re-airs Wednesday and Thursday at 6:30 p.m.)

If you’re wondering what the leader of the free world is doing fishing on an obscure cable TV show, you don’t know politics. In a tight presidential campaign, the candidates seek any edge they can get, and will find it all over the TV dial.

Both Bush and Democrat John Kerry want to seem like regular guys so voters can relate to them, said Scott Reed, a Republican political consultant who ran Bob Dole’s presidential campaign in 1996.

“The number of folks that fish is off the chart,” Reed said. “It reminds you that he’s a normal guy who spends his leisure time doing the things that we do.”

Undecided voters are more likely to be spending Sunday mornings on their boats than in front of “Meet the Press,” he said.

That’s why Reed kept sending Dole to NASCAR races during the 1996 campaign, although it’s one of the last places you’d expect to see the distinguished former Senate GOP leader.

“People are voting for the person, more so than any other political office,” said Chris Lehane, a Democratic aide who was press secretary to Vice President Al Gore. “It comes down to a comfort level with the person you’re going to choose. They’re going to have to live with them for the next four years.”

Bush also recently gave an interview to ESPN, and the sports network is using presidential sound bites repeatedly for its series about the top moments in sports over the past 25 years.

Not to be outdone, Kerry showed up to throw out the first ball in Fenway Park at a Yankees-Red Sox game that was being televised nationally by ESPN.

Martin had met Bush on a couple of occasions and fished once with his father. A mutual friend suggested the president might want to fish with Martin, and an invitation came in April. Bush brought Martin to the pond he had stocked with bass in Crawford. Bush’s Scottish terrier, Barney, tagged along.

The two never talked politics.

“He was just an old fishing buddy, and that’s the way we portrayed him on film,” Martin said. “What we wanted to show was that this president was a fisherman.”

That’s another advantage of these appearances. People at the network graced with a president’s presence are usually so star-struck, or grateful that he’s there, that there’s nothing approaching a tough question.

New York Daily News sports columnist Bob Raissman used one of his favorite terms, “Twinkie munch,” to describe the softness of ESPN’s interview with Kerry at Fenway. Bush should demand equal time, he said.

Politicians stand a better chance of delivering their ultimate message — that they’re likable and worth spending time with — at these kind of appearances than during a policy interview with a journalist, Lehane said.

“Would you rather go on television and discuss your technique and strategy for hooking a bigmouth bass,” he said, “or would you rather go and discuss your strategy for getting the soldiers out of Iraq?”

ESPN had been trying since February for a sit-down with Bush for its 25th anniversary series. The network wanted the president to talk about how sports reacted after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and how Bush threw out the first ball for a game at Yankee Stadium, said Robert Abbott, the series’ coordinating producer.

That episode of the series has done particularly well in the ratings, he said.

“It’s a real feather in our cap,” Abbott said. “We loved having him. He was very important to the 9/11 show. If we only wanted him for one show, that was the one we wanted to get him for.”

But Bush kept talking about other topics — Pete Rose, the use of steroids in sports, the “Miracle on Ice” Olympic hockey game in 1980, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa’s pursuit of the home run record. ESPN was promised 15 minutes, but Bush talked on camera for 25.

As a result, Bush appears in seven of the series’ episodes — seven programs that are repeated over and over again for sports fans.

Most of these TV appearances are relatively harmless and can have great benefit, like when candidate Bill Clinton appeared on “The Arsenio Hall Show” playing a saxophone, Lehane said.

But they also can backfire. It took a while for Clinton to live down the “boxers or briefs” question on MTV, he said.

“You always have to be prepared when you’re putting yourself in a different context,” Lehane said. “You also have to bear in mind that you’re running for the highest office in the world and people hold you to different standards.”

Candidates already are pinpointing their advertising to flood battleground states and virtually ignore other areas where the race isn’t considered tight. Many of the niche cable channels offer similar opportunities; campaigns are able to slice things finely to reach just the audience they want.

Reed said he’s already been surprised at the amount of money spent in advertising this year on smaller networks.

With both candidates coming from privileged backgrounds, they’re likely to seek more opportunities to demonstrate their likability, the political strategists said.

“The next step in the process is you’ll see candidates doing the various cooking shows at 11 o’clock on a Friday night,” Lehane said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.