ShareThis Page
Campaigns shameful |

Campaigns shameful

| Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:52 p.m

Campaigns shameful

Can American political campaigns be any more shameful and disgusting than they have become in the past few years?

Many current candidates and their campaigns are an embarrassment. Based on the amount of mudslinging, there must be a lot of pig farmers running for office.

When did the focus of campaigns become about how evil and destructive the other guy is instead of how good a candidate is? Instead of laying out a logical plan for improvement, we get fear-mongering and hollow words.

What they’re saying is, “Here you go, you fools. Chew on this. You’re stupid and we know it.” They toy with us, counting on the votes of the easily fooled, the frightened and the uninformed. Since many don’t have exemplary records on which to run, they try to anger or scare people, especially the elderly. They count on voters being emotional, not logical; fearful and angry, not rational.

It’s disturbing to think how many people are going to vote for a candidate because he or she has succeeded in frightening them or convincing them to hate the other guy.

It’s time for voters to take a deep breath, clear the mud and vote for the country instead of the party. Let’s be smarter than the politicians.

Tim Kaczmarek


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.