ShareThis Page
Can Frost heal the Democrats? |

Can Frost heal the Democrats?

| Sunday, January 23, 2005 12:00 a.m

WASHINGTON — Having had their fill of post-election introspection, the 447 Democratic Party luminaries who on Feb. 12 will elect their new chairman surely now yearn for stronger wine and madder music. Many yearn for Howard Dean, the highly carbonated tribune of “the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party.” Dean is fun — a scream, you might say.

But losing is not. So the 447 should wonder whether, after JohnKerry’s defeat, another liberal Northeasterner is the proper poultice forthe party’s wounds. Hotline’s poll — 42 percent of the 447 responding –shows that a refugee from a red state is second behind Dean.

Martin Frost is a political lifer eager to prolong his engagement inparty affairs that began in 1968 when, as a Georgetown University lawstudent, he volunteered at the headquarters of Hubert Humphrey’spresidential campaign. Frost’s 13-term congressional career ended lastNovember when he was one of four Texas Democrats who were victims of the mid-decade redistricting engineered by Rep. Tom DeLay. Democrats like victims as much as they dislike DeLay, so Frost has a double claim on Democrats’ pity, which is their sincerest compliment.

Frost says that while losing his Dallas seat he neverthelessdemonstrated the skills of a political mechanic, skills needed by anyDemocrat chairman competing with the Republicans’ chairman, Ken Mehlman. Frost boasts that for the first time in 20 years Democrats — four of them — were elected to Dallas County offices, including a Hispanic lesbian as sheriff.

Frost ran unsuccessfully against Nancy Pelosi for House minorityleader, saying he thought her too liberal. She has encouraged, but notendorsed, the candidacy of former Indiana Rep. Tim Roemer, a member of the 9/11 commission, who is more conservative than Frost.

Roemer, however, is the combined first or second choice of just 11 percent in Hotline’s poll, partly because he committed the unpardonablefaux pas of suggesting that Democrats unwisely regard every wrinkle in the pro-abortion agenda — including opposition to parental notification and support for partial-birth abortions — as sacraments of the Church of Choice.

Frost, who clerked for the lower court judge who made the Roe v. Wade ruling that the Supreme Court sustained, says, “I think we could get right on parental notification — with a judicial bypass.” That will not get him excommunicated.

Frost, who had ancestors in Texas politics a century ago, has beenendorsed by former party chairman Robert Strauss, who attended theUniversity of Texas with Frost’s parents, and by Maryland Rep. Steny Hoyer, who ranks second to Pelosi in the Democrats’ House leadership. Hoyer says Frost “reinvented” the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in the four years he ran it after the Democrats lost 52 seats in the 1994 elections.

Democrats, Frost proudly notes, gained 9 seats in 1996. But how could they not have bounced back a bit• In 1998, Democrats survived the electorate’s “six year itch” for change: For the first time in a century, the party of a president in the middle of his second term gained seats — five of them. But Democrats were still at a low base, and were boosted by Republican obsessiveness about Bill Clinton’s glandular life.

Frost wants to reverse the atrophy of many state parties that happens when national Democrats chase the chimera of winning the White House by running the table in the 18 to 20 states they contest. His wife is the highest-ranking woman general on active Army duty, and he supported a general — Wesley Clark — for the 2004 presidential nomination. Frost thinks that if Democrats will stop talking about gun control — he talks about shooting awards he won at age 8 — and if they can sound more serious about the U.S. military’s guns, Democrats can carry some red states.

Frost says Dean is “such a lightning rod in various parts of thecountry.” But what you might think is Frost’s most favorable contrast with Dean — that Frost is not incandescent — might be a disadvantage. Some Democrats think that only Dean could slow the party’s probable slide from a Northeastern liberal presidential nominee in 2004 to one in 2008 with even less appeal in red states — Hillary Clinton. Dean might be the only chairman with enough political stature and fermenting personality to prevent Bill Clinton’s restless energies from influencing every party and candidate’s calculation.

Granted, the restorative powers of the next Democratic Party chairman are rather less than many of the 447 party luminaries who will select him probably imagine. But as has been said, the consolation of imaginary things is not imaginary consolation.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.