Canadian to serve eight more years in soldier’s death |

Canadian to serve eight more years in soldier’s death

GUANTANAMO BAY U.S. NAVAL BASE, Cuba — A war crimes tribunal yesterday sentenced Canadian captive Omar Khadr to 40 years in prison for charges that included murdering an American soldier in battle, but his plea agreement capped his sentence at eight years.

That means the Toronto native will serve eight more years, in addition to the eight he has spent in detention at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. naval base.

His plea deal calls for him to be sent home to Canada in one year to serve the rest of his sentence there, although “the decision on that is solely up to the Canadian government,” said the judge, Army Col. Patrick Parrish.

Khadr pleaded guilty Oct. 25 to all five charges against him, including conspiring with al-Qaida to commit terrorist acts, making roadside bombs to target U.S. troops in Afghanistan, spying on American military convoys and providing material support for terrorism.

He was 15 years old when captured in Afghanistan in 2002; he is now 24. He is the first person since World War II to be prosecuted in a war crimes tribunal for acts committed as a juvenile.

Now tall and broad-shouldered with a full beard, Khadr wore a gray suit and stood to face the seven military officers of the jury as the verdict was read. He stared straight ahead, then seemed to smile in relief.

Tabitha Speer, widow of the Special Forces soldier whom Khadr admitted killing with a grenade, cheered and raised a fist as the jury’s decision was read in the hilltop courtroom at the Guantanamo Bay base.

Her husband, Sgt. 1st Class Christopher Speer, was among more than 1,000 U.S. troops killed in hostilities during the ongoing war in Afghanistan. Khadr is the only person held liable for any of those deaths.

He is the fifth man convicted by the war crimes tribunal established after the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001 to try foreign captives on terrorism charges.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.