Candidate drops out, leaving 5 unopposed |

Candidate drops out, leaving 5 unopposed

Victory appears to have come early for five Avonworth School Board candidates.

Leslie Lancaster, of Ben Avon, has pulled out of the race, leaving the remaining candidates unopposed for five vacant seats. Her name won’t appear on the ballot.

Lancaster, who has been an active volunteer in the district, said she decided that being on the school board is not the best way for her to work for the schools.

“I am concerned that my skin is not thick enough to be on the school board,” she said. “You really should not let emotion get in the way of a job like that.”

Four of the five remaining candidates are cross-filed as Democrats and Republicans. A fifth candidate, Brenda Barlek, who lives in Ohio Township, will run unopposed on the Democratic ballot.

Lancaster came in last among seven candidates in May’s Democratic primary. She was fifth among six candidates in the Republican primary.

The remaining candidates are lawyer Peter McKay, of Ben Avon; former school board member Marybeth Sommers, of Emsworth; Avonworth High School teacher Peter Domencic, of Emsworth; and law student Rob Wible, of Ohio Township.

Domencic already has informed the school board that he will resign his teaching position upon taking office as a board member.

Despite Lancaster’s withdrawal, Barlek said she is not taking victory for granted.

“It’s not over until it’s over,” she said. “There could always be write-in candidates.”

Five current board members — Jack Connors, Betsy Radcliffe, Gary Short, Susan Abramowich and Michael Mohr — are not seeking re-election.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.