ShareThis Page
Candidates detail plans for reviving steel town |

Candidates detail plans for reviving steel town

| Sunday, April 27, 2003 12:00 a.m

The three candidates seeking the Democratic Party nomination for McKeesport mayor in the May 20 primary include two political rivals and a newcomer.

Incumbent Wayne Kucich, who is seeking a second term, is being challenged by council President James Brewster. The two have often publicly butted heads.

Candidate Keith Murphy, a newcomer to politics, said he hopes to change some longstanding City Hall practices.

No Republican filed candidacy papers for the primary.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review asked the candidates a series of questions about plans for the once-thriving steel town that is trying to reinvent itself:

What should be done about the blighted areas of the city?

Brewster: What has been a well-kept secret here in McKeesport is a demolition program in place since 1985. We continue to demolish 50 to 100 properties a year, depending on funding. I would like to add a strategic plan that identifies (the properties) for demolition that are the most dangerous to the public and have a plan in place to replace the building, not leaving the site to be taken over by weeds, which is what occurs today.

Kucich: All the dilapidated buildings are being removed and any building that can be (rehabilitated) is being rehabilitated. If you don’t remove the blighted structures, what happens is it spreads just like a cancer and also causes health and safety problems as well as vagrancy and other dangerous situations. When we removed abandoned homes it reduced the city fire calls by 80 percent. I’m working with the governor’s office to get funding to remove the blight and put the final nail in the coffin to complete the project.

Murphy: We need to remedy that, but it (shouldn’t) be a process of (only) tearing down. A plan has to be made available that will replace structures that will be torn down or find creative ways to repair and use those existing structures for the benefit of the community.

What should be done to attract new business to McKeesport?

Brewster: The diverse business development plan addresses development throughout the city not only on the mill site, although the mill site is the primary location. I am in discussion with two developers for potential shopping centers in other areas of the city and there is some interest in the East End. The plan is to continue to offer the incentives that would cause developers to come here and not elsewhere. We are in negotiations with six businesses up to and including maglev. As mayor I’m going to market our city and convince them this is the best place.

Kucich: It all refers back to livability. People will want to move to our city and bring their businesses here if they have a safe, clean place to live. There is now a clean appearance about the city, and the road conditions have been improved. People are starting to look at the possibilities. We have lowered the wage tax to be more competitive. Our police department has a good record in solving crimes. We’ve done everything we had to do.

Murphy: First we must engage in building a better and positive image of the city. After that, we will be better able to show all the benefits that McKeesport can offer the technology companies, the other businesses and corporate structures and even educational institutions.

How would you handle the city budget deficit?

Brewster: It’s our opinion and it’s been agreed upon by the Kucich administration and will soon be confirmed by the auditor that we have a deficit that could be approximately $1 million. I will use my 27 years in the banking business to get control of the budget and explain to the public exactly what funds are available and prioritize projects. Eliminate this smoke-filled room financial policy. We want to be open and forthright with people’s money.

Kucich: When we started the year 2003, there wasn’t a budget deficit, we were even in the black. We started with $29,000 in the bank. We have all the problems that every other city and municipality throughout the country has, but we didn’t have to borrow money. We’ve done 20 percent to 25 percent more streets than any other administration. We’ve lowered taxes every year since I have been elected mayor, just as I promised.

Murphy: The budget issue we have to address from a very serious evaluation process. While we continue to spend we have fallen short in generating dollars from outside to support our daily operations. We will have to address the budget from a collective responsibility of the mayor and City Council working as a team.

McKeesport mayoral candidates

James Brewster

  • Age: 54
  • Residence: McKeesport
  • Occupation: Works as an auditor; retired from Mellon Bank
  • Political party: Democrat
  • Political experience: Current president of McKeesport Council, on council 10 years; served seven of his first eight years as council president
  • Family: Married, three daughters.

    Wayne Kucich

  • Age: 53
  • Residence: McKeesport
  • Occupation: Mayor of McKeesport
  • Political party: Democrat
  • Political experience: Served two terms as McKeesport City Controller and was elected mayor in 2000
  • Family: Married, three children

    Keith Murphy

  • Age: 41
  • Residence: McKeesport
  • Occupation: Executive director of Bethany House Ministry
  • Political party: Democrat
  • Political experience: First campaign for political office
  • Family: Married

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.