ShareThis Page
Candy tampering fears unfounded |

Candy tampering fears unfounded

| Tuesday, October 30, 2007 12:00 a.m

In his years as an Allegheny General Hospital radiologist, Dr. Kamyar Ilkhanipour has seen strange things in kids’ X-rays — including coins that have found their way down throats.

But despite the warnings we hear every Halloween about the risk of kids eating candy filled with razor blades, needles and pins, Ilkhanipour has yet to encounter victims of sabotaged treats.

“I have to say I’ve been hearing about Halloween candy tampering since I was small, but I’ve yet to hear of anyone in the hospital discovering it,” he said.

Documented cases of kids ingesting unsafe Halloween treats tend to be harder to pin down than a billowy, white ghost in a “Casper” cartoon.

West Penn Hospital spokeswoman Stephanie Wade said the hospital has not conducted candy screenings for 20 years because there is no need to power up the X-ray machines every Oct. 31.

Over at Mercy Hospital, emergency room physician Dr. Kaveh Ilkhanipour — Kamyar Ilkhanipour’s brother — said he has never seen a child brought in suffering from tainted candy bars or apples.

After hours of searching the Internet for evidence of candy tampering, the closest I came to uncovering an incidence of this perennial Halloween fright was an academic study refuting its existence.

According to an exhaustive, 30-year study of candy tampering undertaken by University of Southern Illinois professor Joel Best, the practice turns out to be just another one of those scary fables that swirl around the last days of October like so much morning fog.

In the two nationally reported cases of candy tampering that Best found, one involved a kid whose parents claimed he’d died after being given heroin-spiked candy. Police later discovered the child actually became sick after eating some of his father’s heroin stash.

So why, each year, do local TV news outlets bristle with stories warning parents that potentially deadly sweets could be lurking in the bottoms of their treat bags and some local hospitals offer free X-ray screenings for candy?

I guess it’s because we enjoy scaring ourselves, particularly at Halloween, a time when tall tales are part of the holiday tradition.

There were several national product tampering incidents during the 1980s, which helped perpetuate the candy tampering scare for generations to come. To be safe, Allegheny General’s Dr. Kamyar Ilkhanipour reminded parents to “carefully check every piece of candy their kids bring home.”

An even better way exists to ensure that your kids don’t bring home any bad treats. Only take them trick-or-treating at the homes of neighbors that you know personally, which virtually eliminates the chance of running into strange treats.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.