Archive

ShareThis Page
Canevin softball player Rittelmann chooses Wheeling Jesuit | TribLIVE.com
News

Canevin softball player Rittelmann chooses Wheeling Jesuit

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 26, 2014 1:18 p.m
SIGBCsign2112714
Submitted
Rachel Rittelman signed her letter of intent to play softball at Wheeling Jesuit last week.

When looking for a college to continue her eduction and softball career, Bishop Canevin senior Rachel Rittelmann found what she was looking for at Wheeling Jesuit.

“It felt like a good fit,” the infielder said. “It is like a bigger Bishop Canevin.”

Rittelmann chose Wheeling Jesuit over Cal. (Pa.), Slippery Rock, Indiana (Pa.) and Methodist University. She plans to study athletic training and psychology. The Cardinals are a member of the Mountain East Conference at the NCAA Division II level. The conference is also home to Charleston, Concord, Glenville State, Fairmont State, Notre Dame (Oh.), Urbana, Virginia-Wise, West Liberty, West Virginia State, West Virginia Wesleyan and Wheeling Jesuit.

“I have been working on getting to the next level for a few years,” Rittelmann said. “Since freshman year it has been a goal.”

Rittelmann transferred to Bishop Canevin from Hopewell for her junior season. She is a multi-sport athlete for Bishop Canevin as she was a defensive specialist on the girls volleyball team, receiving third-team all-Section 2-A honors this season.

With her decision out of the way, Rittelmann can now focus on her last season with the Crusaders. The team returns every player from a squad that reached the quarterfinals of the WPIAL Class A playoffs last season.

“We want to go after the section title,” Rittelmann. “And we obviously want to make another playoff run.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at nsmith@tribweb.com or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.