ShareThis Page
Capital Gazette suspect allegedly mailed threatening letters before shooting |

Capital Gazette suspect allegedly mailed threatening letters before shooting

The Capital Gazette
| Monday, July 2, 2018 8:18 p.m
Jose Luis Magana | AP
Capital Gazette reporter E.B. Furgurson III pauses by the crosses representing his five colleagues at a makeshift memorial at the scene outside the office building housing The Capital Gazette newspaper in Annapolis, Md., Sunday, July 1, 2018. Prosecutors say 38-year-old Jarrod W. Ramos opened fire Thursday in the Capital Gazette newsroom killing five employees.
Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images
A newspaper vending machine sells copies of The Capitol, with stories about last week's shooting at the community newspaper's office July 2, 2018 in Annapolis, Md.

The alleged gunman in the killings Thursday at The Capital sent three threatening letters before the shooting rampage at the Annapolis newspaper, Anne Arundel County police said Monday.

Thomas Marquardt, the Capital’s former publisher, said the paper’s former attorney turned over to police mail received at his law office Monday — a document, signed in the suspect’s name, saying he was on his way to the newspaper “with the objective of killing every person present.”

The document was dated June 28, the day of the shootings. It included instructions to share a copy with Marquardt, the former publisher said. The document was signed Jarrod W. Ramos, who is charged with five counts of first-degree murder in the mass shooting.

Anne Arundel County police said investigators believe Ramos mailed three letters in total, including one to Maryland’s Court of Special Appeals and one to a Baltimore City judge.

Police spokesman Marc Limansky declined to describe the letters but said they bear Ramos’ name and return address. He said police believe they were sent before the attack, and detectives are now investigating.

“They’ll examine them and see what the letters show,” Limansky said. “It could point to different things. It could maybe open up another avenue of exploration.”

The document received by The Capital’s former attorney is styled a “Motion for Reconsideration” by Maryland’s top court, which in 2016 refused to hear a defamation case Ramos had filed against the newspaper.

“You were too cowardly to confront those lies, and this is your receipt,” the document says. “I told you so.”

The writer says a copy was being sent to the newspaper’s lawyer.

“I further certify I then did proceed to the office of respondent Capital-Gazette Communications … with the objective of killing every person present,” the document says.

A letter attached to the filing is addressed to retired Judge Charles Moylan Jr., who wrote a scathing opinion against Ramos as part of the defamation case.

“Welcome, Mr. Moylan, to your unexpected legacy: YOU should have died,” the letter says.

In an interview, Marquardt called the document “chilling.”

Police say Ramos used a shotgun to blast through the doors of The Capital newsroom Thursday afternoon. In a post on Twitter moments before the shooting, Ramos wrote, “F — you, leave me alone” and tagged another account he appears to have created in Moylan’s name.

Ramos is charged in the killings of editor and columnist Rob Hiaasen, 59; Wendi Winters, 65, a community correspondent who led special publications; editorial page editor Gerald Fischman, 61; editor and sports writer John McNamara, 56; and Rebecca Smith, 34, a recently hired sales assistant.

Ramos held a long-standing grudge against the paper. It began with an article in The Capital in 2011 that detailed a criminal harassment charge that a woman filed against Ramos, a former high school classmate of hers.

Capital editor Rick Hutzell told staff members Monday morning that a threatening letter had been sent by Ramos. He told his reporters not to open their own mail going forward.

“Do not open any mail,” he said. “We’re going to filter it first.”

A spokeswoman for the judiciary declined to comment.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.