ShareThis Page
Cards blast Pirates, 9-3 |

Cards blast Pirates, 9-3

Rob Biertempfel
| Tuesday, April 7, 2009 12:00 a.m

ST. LOUIS — Much as it was throughout spring training, the Pirates’ bullpen is a work in progress.

The back end of the ‘pen — closer Matt Capps and his setup men — is secure. But the rest can be a risky proposition.

That’s a big reason the Pirates hoped starter Ian Snell could shake off last season’s bad form Tuesday night and pitch deep into the game against the St. Louis Cardinals.

Instead, the Cardinals scored early and often on their way to a 9-3 rout. Snell was bounced after allowing eight runs (six earned) in four innings.

There was one mildly encouraging sign: the bullpen gave up just one run.

Snell missed a scheduled start in the final week of spring training due to flu-like symptoms. He played for Puerto Rico in the World Baseball Classic, and pitched in just three Grapefruit League games.

His final spring tune-up was a two-inning stint Saturday in a minor league game.

Before yesterday’s game, Pirates manager John Russell said Snell was not on a strict pitch count due to his limited spring workload.

“His arm is built up and he could go deep into a game if he had to,” Russell said. “We’ll see how it goes. Arm strength, durability — he’s in good shape. He should be able to go as long as we need him to go.”

Not that long, as it turned out.

After just two innings, Snell had thrown 30 pitches. In the third, he threw 23 pitches and gave up three more runs. The barrage included two-run homers by Chris Duncan and Albert Pujols.

Just 10 days ago, general manager Neal Huntington described the bullpen as “really unstable.” There is no long reliever. The mix includes former starter Sean Burnett, but last season he went two-plus innings in just five of his 58 outings.

Other options• Craig Hansen. Jesse Chavez. Donnie Veal.

And so, even though the Cardinals were up 6-1 and had Snell’s measure, the right-hander went back out for the fourth inning.

It was a 26-pitch nightmare.

With two outs, Colby Rasmus, making his major league debut, beat out an infield single. Pujols hit a high pop-up … which third baseman Andy LaRoche dropped for a two-base error.

Duncan was intentionally walked. Khalil Greene smoked a line-hugging, two-run double to left.

When the inning ended, so, mercifully, did Snell’s night.

Snell’s performance — low on innings and strikes, high on pitches and runs — was disturbingly reminiscent of last year. Snell lasted four innings or less in nine of his 31 starts in 2008.

Veal started the fifth inning — the first major league appearance by the Rule 5 pick.

Yadier Molina launched Veal’s third pitch into the seats in left-center field.

Veal got a pair of strikeouts, then walked the bases loaded on 13 pitches. Duncan took a called third strike, ending the inning.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.