Carnegie council considers free holiday parking |

Carnegie council considers free holiday parking

Carnegie council is considering allowing free two-hour parking at metered spaces in the borough from Black Friday to Christmas of this year.

Holiday shoppers might just be able to park for free in Carnegie this winter. At the request of several business owners and representatives, Carnegie council is considering allowing free two-hour parking at metered spaces in the borough from Black Friday to Christmas of this year.

“Honestly, 2018 has been a rough year business-wise. Papa J’s burning down was like the icing on the cake,” Larry Scott of Modern Mercantile said, referring to the fire that this summer claimed the popular restaurant.

Carnegie previously permitted free parking at meters from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. for lunch. Council members discussed reinstating those hours to prevent drivers from taking advantage of spaces, but Mayor Stacie Riley said reverting to them could cause confusion.

Solicitor Nate Boring suggested council limit free parking to two hours at a time. Council President Sue Demko and Vice-President Phil Boyd both voiced their support for free holiday parking, with Boyd noting that it must be made clear to business owners that spaces are intended for shoppers and visitors only.

“Every other community does it. Bridgeville does it, Dormont does it, Sewickley,” Riley said. “I think that we owe it to our business district. They’ve revitalized Carnegie.”

Council will take up the matter for a vote at its October meeting.

Matthew Guerry is a Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.