Archive

ShareThis Page
Heidelberg council to revisit animal ordinance | TribLIVE.com
Carnegie/Bridgeville

Heidelberg council to revisit animal ordinance

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:01 p.m.

Heidelberg council is revisiting the borough’s animal-maintenance ordinance to include regulations that would outline ownership, boarding and other issues related to domestic animals, chickens, bees and exotic animals.

Borough officials tackled the topic at the Nov. 11 workshop meeting.

The main discussion involved proposed changes to limit the number of cats or dogs a resident can own to three, while also requiring any pets to either be in a fenced area or on a leash while outside.

“I don’t feel like we should be limiting the number of pets someone should have or making them have to build a fence,” said Carrie Nolan, council vice president.

The discussion ended with individual council members planning to submit their proposed revisions in writing by the first week of December.

Other proposed sections of the ordinance included prohibiting the ownership of exotic or wild animals and restricting bees in a similar fashion to farm animals. In addition, council members discussed whether to make it illegal to maintain farm animals on less than 5 acres.

The ordinance will be revisited at the Dec. 9 council meeting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.