Longtime Heidelberg manager leaving post, council begins search |

Longtime Heidelberg manager leaving post, council begins search

For the first time in nine years, Heidelberg is in need of a new borough manager.

Joe Kauer, manager since 2005, informed council on Nov. 11 that he had accepted a similar position in Ambridge beginning Dec. 1.

Council will contact the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, which can offer help to find a new manager. The state agency assists municipalities in planning and community development for free.

“They know Heidelberg and the issues we are facing,” said Kauer. “It’s very professional as they keep the politics out of it and help find the best candidate out there.”

Heidelberg officials will choose the qualifications they want in their next manager. DCED then receives incoming resumes and identify candidates based on those recommendations before presenting them to council, without identifying names, he said.

Council will then learn more about the candidate when they arrive for an interview.

Kauer’s last full day will be Nov. 26, however, he will continue to work nights and take care of essential functions such as finances, payroll and prepare council agendas for the Heidelberg office until Dec. 19 while using his benefits.

He called the new job a professional move.

“It’s a bigger municipality that I believe I can learn and grow more professionally at,” he said.

Ambridge has a population of 7,050 with a $4.1 million budget compared to Heidelberg’s 1,300 residents and $1.3 million budget.

With the new job comes a salary of about $60,000, about $15,000 more than his current salary, Kauer said.

Council ended a Nov. 18 meeting applauding Kauer for his work.

There is no timetable for a replacement.

Alex Felser is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5810 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.