Case of fired officer may get arbitrator today |

Case of fired officer may get arbitrator today

An arbitrator could be chosen today to hear the case of Jeffrey Veltre, 37, of Elizabeth, a seven-year veteran who was fired Oct. 2 by Elizabeth Township commissioners.

“They promised me that they would pick an arbitrator by Friday,” said Steve Greenberg, Veltre’s attorney. Greenberg works with Teamster’s Local 205, the union that represents Veltre.

The union, contending Veltre was wrongfully fired, is seeking his reinstatement and as much as $70,000 in back pay.

On Aug. 28, Veltre was found not guilty by Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge David Cashman of indecent assault.

The charge was the only reason township commissioners gave to justify Veltre’s dismissal, although they alluded to “other reasons.”

When Veltre was acquitted, he should have gotten his job back immediately, the union contends.

But Veltre has run into other trouble, according to the state police.

Cpl. James Hills in the Commonwealth Law Enforcement Assistance Network — also known as CLEAN — administrative section of state police said Veltre’s privileges to use the CLEAN system have been revoked.

Greenberg, Veltre’s attorney, said the revoking of Veltre’s CLEAN privileges will be an issue at his arbitration hearing. He declined further comment.

The CLEAN system, run by the state police, allows police officers to determine the ownership of a vehicle by entering the vehicle’s license plate numbers into the system.

Hills said Veltre’s privileges have been revoked because he used his access as a police officer to give CLEAN system information to a non-police officer.

“Any information coming out of our system has to be for official purposes,” Hills said.

Hills said his office revoked Veltre’s privileges in March after an investigation by Elizabeth Township police revealed that Veltre had given CLEAN system information to a township resident who claimed someone was following him.

Township police Chief Bob Wallace said he cannot confirm or deny that investigation.

Hills said after receiving information about the incident from Elizabeth Township police, state police conducted their own investigation.

“We know the information was obtained and information was given to someone that it shouldn’t have been,” Hills said.

Carl Bailey, Local 205 business manager, said if Veltre wins his arbitration case and gets his job back, the revocation of his CLEAN privileges wouldn’t prevent him from functioning as a police officer.

Bailey said police frequently check license plates for non-officers, and several officers in Allegheny County without CLEAN privileges still have their jobs. He declined to identify those officers.

“I don’t think he did anything that 99 percent of your police officers don’t do on a daily basis,” Bailey said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.