ShareThis Page
Casino visitors don’t follow stereotypes, survey shows |

Casino visitors don’t follow stereotypes, survey shows

| Sunday, June 15, 2014 9:00 p.m.

People who enjoy casinos are a lot like everyone else, according to a new study.

“Casino visitors are a portrait of the American electorate,” Geoff Freeman, president and CEO of the American Gaming Association, says during a conference call. “They’re well-educated, middle-class voters and homeowners who regularly attend religious services, and most are ages 21 to 59, the target audience local businesses are trying to reach.”

The association, which represents commercial casinos, conducts an annual survey about gambling attitudes and habits. The 2014 results were released last week as the first major initiative in the association’s “Get to Know Gaming” campaign, which aims to build a case for reducing taxes on casinos and streamlining government regulations involving gambling. Pennsylvania’s 55 percent tax rate on slot revenue is part of what Freeman calls government’s “tax and torture” approach to the casino industry.

Democratic pollster Mark Mellman, CEO of the Mellman Group, and Republican pollster Glen Bolger, founder and partner of Public Opinion Strategies, conducted the survey in May. It has a margin of error of 3.1 percent.

Many findings bolster the association’s push to ease the burden on casinos. The survey finds that 87 percent of the public say gambling is an acceptable activity; That is two points higher than last year and the highest such rating on record.

It shows that 48 percent of the public have a favorable view of the casino industry, while 24 percent see it as unfavorable and 27 percent have no opinion. Casinos get high marks as a business: 59 percent say they help the local economy and 74 percent say they create jobs; 26 percent say casino have a negative impact on the area vs. 46 percent who see a positive impact and 14 percent who see no impact.

Beyond the political fodder, the survey provides insights about the people who rub elbows at the slot machines and blackjack tables.

Bolger says the findings shoot down stereotypes such as grandma spending her last pennies of the month at the slot machine.

“Casino visitors really are a pretty good reflection of America, overall,” he says, ticking off these statistics:

• Nearly two of three casino visitors own a home

• Most are 21 to 59 years old

• A plurality make $60,000 to $99,000 a year, and 70 percent consider themselves middle class

• A majority went to college, and 46 percent have a degree, which is 16 points above the general public

• They are religious. Two-thirds attend church, and one of every four consider themselves evangelical or born-again Christian

By far, slots remain the most popular game, with 48 percent saying machines are their favorite form of casino gambling;. Blackjack is second at 14 percent. Poker, roulette, video poker and craps follow, all with 4 to 6 percent of gamblers ranking them as their favorite.

However, slots aren’t the most common form of gambling. That distinction belongs to state lotteries, which have far worse odds of winning than slots or any casino table game.

Mellman says the popularity of gambling seems to be growing among young adults.

About 37 percent of casino visitors are 21 to 39 years old, he says, while that age group accounts for about 26 percent of those who don’t go to casinos.

“That younger demographic is more likely to go to casinos,” he says.

Freeman says young adults help fuel the increasing acceptance of gambling.

The percentage of people with unfavorable views of gambling and casinos drops significantly among Americans younger than 49.

“The acceptance, and really the embracing, of gaming is greater than ever,” he says.

Mark Gruetze is administrative editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7838 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.