Casorio victim of GOP sweep; Doyle avoids upset |

Casorio victim of GOP sweep; Doyle avoids upset

All results reflect complete but unofficial returns from area county election offices.

The state U.S. House delegation flipped from Democratic to Republican control, despite wins for two area Democrats.

Democratic Reps. Mike Doyle of Forest Hills and Mark S. Critz of Johnstown were returned to Washington Tuesday along with Republican Rep. Tim Murphy of Upper St. Clair.

Meanwhile, the state House flipped from Democratic to Republican control, thanks in part to the upset of a veteran area lawmaker.

Rep. James E. Casorio Jr., D-North Huntingdon Township, lost his 56th District seat to former Westmoreland County GOP chairman George Dunbar.

“We knew that it was a Herculean task to beat a 14-year incumbent, especially one who was popular among his constituents,” said Dunbar, who is Second Ward commissioner in Penn Township.

“We were capitalizing on the fact that people are ready for some change in Harrisburg,” Dunbar said. “The voters are tired of the out-of-control spending. They are spending money we do not have. (Voters) are tired of spending on pet projects.”

Dunbar and Casorio spent much of Tuesday together. Both stationed themselves at the Penns Woods development in North Huntingdon.

“I had a wonderful volunteer base; we had all the bases covered,” Dunbar said, also acknowledging the help he received from the state GOP.

While Dunbar knocked on 8,000 doors and his volunteers went to thousands of doors, the Harrison City-area representative-elect said “the hard work begins now” in Harrisburg.

According to the Westmoreland County Elections Bureau, Dunbar received 11,363, Casorio 10,572. Dunbar said he plans to resign as a commissioner at this month’s Penn board meeting.

Also in Westmoreland County, Rep. R. Ted Harhai, D-Monessen, turned back Republican nominee Rob Ferguson, 10,695-8,349, in the 58th Legislative District.

In the 25th Legislative District straddling the Allegheny-Westmoreland line, Rep. Joseph Markosek, D-Monroeville, was a narrow winner over Republican Mike Doyle.

Markosek won by 1,600 votes, winning by 9,798-7,846 in Allegheny County. Doyle won Westmoreland, 2,190-1,865, but lost overall 11,663-10,036.

Four area House Democrats were unopposed: 34th District Rep. Paul Costa of Wilkins Township, 35th District Rep. Marc Gergely of White Oak, 36th District Rep. Harry Readshaw of Carrick and 38th District Rep. Bill Kortz of Dravosburg.

Republicans maintained control of the state Senate, but Democrats held on to the 46th District which extends from Elizabeth to Greene County.

Replacing retiring Sen. J. Barry Stout, D-Somerset Township, will be state Rep. Timothy Solobay, D-Canonsburg, who defeated Bentleyville attorney and farmer Kris Vanderman, 39,322-34,369.

In U.S. House races:

• Doyle won a ninth term from the 14th District, including the cities of Pittsburgh, McKeesport, Clairton and Duquesne, turning back Coraopolis paralegal and Republican nominee Melissa Haluszczak, 121,081-49,692.

Green Party candidate Ed Bortz netted 5,328 votes.

• Murphy won a fifth term from the 18th District, covering suburban areas in four counties between Pittsburgh International and Arnold Palmer Regional airports, 158,224-77,212 over Democratic nominee Dan Connolly.

• Critz narrowly won a rematch in the nine-county 12th District against Washington County businessman and Republican nominee Tim Burns, 91,690-88,670. Locally, that district includes one precinct in Forward Township.

In his bid for a full term in the seat formerly held by the late U.S. Rep. John Murtha, Critz carried majorities in Allegheny, Cambria, Fayette, Greene and Washington counties.

Photo Galleries

Election Day 2010

Election Day 2010

Election day scenes from polling places around the Pittsburgh area, Tuesday, November 2, 2010.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.