ShareThis Page
Cause of fatal blast in Clairton Plant not found |

Cause of fatal blast in Clairton Plant not found

| Saturday, September 5, 2009 12:00 p.m

Federal investigators have not determined a cause — or even entered the site — of an explosion in the Clairton Plant where a contractor for the U.S. Steel Corp. was killed.

“Investigators have still not had access to the area where the explosion occurred,” said Robert Syzmanski, regional director of the Occupational Health and Safety Administration, on Friday.

Syzmanski said the area has not been ruled safe, but that investigators might be able to enter the blast area this weekend.

The blast occurred late Thursday morning in the byproducts area for the coke batteries, which are arrays of ovens where coal is baked into coke, an ingredient in steel-making.

Contractors from four companies had been working in the area where the blast occurred for at least three weeks, Syzmanski said.

The explosion killed Nicholas Revetta, 32 of Pleasant Hills, who died at Jefferson Regional Hospital. Funeral arrangements for Revetta are incomplete, according to the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office.

Neither U.S. Steel nor the Occupational Safety and Health Administration released the name and condition of a second contractor injured the blast who was taken to UPMC Mercy.

“Safety is our company’s top priority, and as such, we have launched an investigation into the incident,” said Courtney Boone, a public affairs manager for U.S. Steel. “We are working with the appropriate organizations and agencies including the USW and OSHA in this investigation. Coke production has resumed and the involved facility has been isolated from the system.”

Revetta worked for Power Piping Co. of Lawrenceville, which specializes in installing industrial pipes and high-pressure equipment. The company declined to comment.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.