ShareThis Page
CCAC interim president returns in same post in search of new president |

CCAC interim president returns in same post in search of new president

Deb Erdley
| Friday, June 21, 2013 11:15 a.m

Community College of Allegheny County’s Board of Trustees announced on Friday that Michael T. Murphy will serve as interim president of the college while the school searches for a replacement for Alex Johnson.

Johnson, president of CCAC since 2008, is leaving at the end of the month to become president of Cuyahoga Community College in Cleveland.

Murphy of University Park, Fla., was interim president at CCAC during the previous presidential search from 2007-08. He was hired as a consultant from the Association of Community College Trustees, which is advising CCAC on its search.

“The board is delighted to see Dr. Murphy returning to help us keep the college moving forward during this period of transition,” said Amy Kuntz, who heads the trustees board.

CCAC’s contract with the association calls for the college to pay Murphy $20,833 a month plus $4,500 per month for expenses. The college will pay the association $3,124.95 a month as a 15 percent administrative fee.

Efforts to recruit Johnson’s successor will begin immediately, but officials won’t review applications or conduct interviews until faculty and staff return to the college’s campuses and centers for the fall semester.

Last month, CCAC trustees inked a four-month, $60,000 contract with the association to serve as a consultant on its search. The contract runs from July 1 through Oct. 31.

A college spokesman said CCAC employees can voice their preferences by taking a survey outlining their expectations for the new president.

Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.