ShareThis Page
Cell-phone rules wise |

Cell-phone rules wise

| Monday, April 16, 2007 12:00 a.m

If school officials in the Valley need a reason to strictly enforce bans on cell-phone use by students, they certainly can cite a recent incident in Kiski Area High School.

A couple weeks ago, a cell-phone picture of two students in a sexually compromising position in a boys bathroom was apparently circulated to numerous student cell phones during the day.

School personnel saw the picture and immediately began looking into the incident and the distribution of the picture. Some cell phones were confiscated.

The two students involved in the incident faced disciplinary action. And Allegheny Township police are investigating.

But school officials also said anyone circulating the pornographic pictures would be disciplined, as well.

A letter was sent home to all parents reminding them of the cell-phone policy. Phones are to be kept in lockers during the school day and those using them in class can have their phones confiscated.

Kiski Area is the latest local school district to crack down on cell phones. Allegheny Valley recently sent letters home to parents about the problem and Armstrong School District updated its policy to include a ban.

Again, parents and school officials need to work together on this problem. The last thing teachers need during the school day is students using their cell phones.

At the end of the school day, kids can phone parents or siblings about transportation or after-school activities. Or parents can leave a message on the phone that students can listen to after school.

We urge all districts to strictly enforce these bans.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.