ShareThis Page
Central Catholic races past Fox Chapel |

Central Catholic races past Fox Chapel

Dave Schrecengost
| Wednesday, February 5, 2003 12:00 a.m

OAKLAND: Fox Chapel’s boys basketball team hasn’t experienced many memorable moments at Central Catholic’s Alumni Hall.

“We’ve won very few times here over the years,” Fox Chapel coach Harry Jenkins said.

With a WPIAL playoff berth on the line Tuesday night, Central Catholic took advantage of its home court advantage against the Foxes.

Backed by a loud home crowd, the Vikings raced to a 15-0 lead to start the game and rolled to a 67-41 victory, locking up third place in Section 4-AAAA.

Fox Chapel, which could have earned a spot in the playoffs for the second year in a row by beating Central, finished 6-6 in the section and dropped to 12-10 overall.

“(The Vikings) are playing very well at this point in the season, and this is the time to do it,” Jenkins said. “We aren’t playing as well as we should.”

The Foxes continued to struggle on offense. Fox Chapel managed to score only 28 points in a loss to Plum in its previous game and didn’t score against Central until Jason Goeller’s layup with 2:20 left in the first period.

“That was the best offensive rebounding I’ve seen by a team in our league in the first quarter this year,” Jenkins said. “They scored 11 points off offensive rebounds in the first half. A lot of the time they were scoring off second shots.”

The Foxes started 0-for-4 from the field and committed five turnovers to fall behind by 15-0 when Jimmy Hyland sank a 3-pointer with 2:40 left in the first quarter.

“We couldn’t get into an offensive flow. The last few games we’ve been struggling,” Jenkins said. “We haven’t been as good on the defensive end lately, either.”

Fox Chapel committed 18 turnovers.

“Every time we turned the ball over, they finished at the other end,” Jenkins said. “And when we were pressing them, they didn’t turn the ball over as much. When we beat them at our place the first time we played, we did create some turnovers.”

The Foxes managed to cut Central’s lead to five points in the third period, but the Vikings pulled away down the stretch behind a balanced scoring attack that saw four players reach double figures.

Demarcus Simmons led Central (7-4, 13-8) with 15 points and made a pair of 3-pointers in the second half that helped deflate the Foxes’ comeback attempt. The Vikings also got 11 points from Hyland and 10 apiece from Daniel Waajid and Ross Watson.

Bryan Teschke led Fox Chapel with 15 points, including 10 in the second half. Pat Brannigan, who averages better than 14 points per game, was held scoreless until the fourth quarter and finished with four points.

Fox Chapel was missing senior guard Brian Urso, sidelined for the second game in a row with a concussion sustained when he hit his head on the floor during a game against Gateway last week.

“That took another ballhandler and 12 points out of our lineup,” Jenkins said.

Central and Fox Chapel played for the section title in last season’s final section game. The Foxes won that game at home and shared the Section 4-AAAA crown with the Vikings.

“I think they were looking for a little payback,” Jenkins said. “And they did that this evening.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.