ShareThis Page
Chairman Veon of the Corruption Party |

Chairman Veon of the Corruption Party

| Wednesday, March 7, 2012 12:00 a.m

Former Pennsylvania House Democratic Whip Mike Veon is scheduled to be sentenced on April 18 for his second round of public corruption convictions. And given that Mr. Veon, the ex-Democrat legislator of Beaver County, now is proven to be the consummate criminal, he should be treated as such.

That means that the jail term he’s sure to receive should be served after he completes his 6-to-14-year term for his first public corruption conviction. Just how many additional years that might be remains unclear. But a state prosecutor says it will be “significant additional time.”

Mr. Veon, 55, was convicted in Dauphin County Common Pleas Court this week of eight felonies and two misdemeanors. He used money from the publicly funded Beaver Initiative for Growth (BIG) to pay for his political proclivities.

In 2010, this “public purpose” thief was convicted in the Bonusgate scandal. He was the mastermind behind a $1.4 million program that paid illegal bonuses for legislative staffers to politick on the public dime.

Veon is a member in solid standing of a growing club of once-prominent Pennsylvania legislative “leaders” who abused their power and abused the public trust to advance their political and personal goals. His second round of convictions makes him the titular leader of the Corruption Party. And justice demands he serve his forthcoming sentence consecutively, not concurrently.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.