ShareThis Page
Changes made to UCC fees |

Changes made to UCC fees

Mark Hofmann
| Tuesday, March 7, 2006 12:00 a.m

This month there are a few changes to the Uniform Construction Code for residents building anything other than a house.

Changes to the fee schedule went into effect March 1, but only affect nonresidential plan review fees.

The plan review fee for nonresidential new buildings and additions, as drawn by an architect and/or engineer, is $300.

Alterations and renovations to an existing commercial building will now have a plan review fee of $150, and applicants requiring an occupancy permit only will not be charged a fee for a plan review.

Tammy Stenson, executive director of the Fayette County Office of Planning, Zoning and Community Development, said the idea to change the fees came as more businesses have started to appear in the county, and a change to the schedule will make the process easier.

“Widewaters in Connellsville is a perfect example,” Stenson said.

While Widewaters Development, of DeWitt, N.Y., had to pay a plan-review fee for the entire building at Widewaters Commons, when vendors set up shop in the building, they will not be charged and will only have a code inspector check the inside of the business if nothing will be changed.

Stenson said she received no negative complaints when she brought up the changes to the Uniform Construction Code at the last Fayette County commissioners meeting at the end of February.

Currently, Stenson said, the code office is tossing around ideas for more possible changes to the code, but said the changes won’t be brought up to the commissioners for a couple of months.

Stenson was happy to report that since the Uniform Construction Code Office was established in August 2004, there has been no increase in fees.

“We just want to make this process easy,” Stenson said.

The county enforces building permits and demolition permits for both residential and nonresidential construction projects for 34 of the 42 municipalities in Fayette County.

Stenson said the eight municipalities that did not opt to work with the county must fulfill the Uniform Construction Code with a third party.

One of those municipalities is Uniontown. Mayor James Sileo said council decided to stay with its own code enforcement officer, Myron Nypaver, and added that the decision was not made out of animosity toward anybody.

“We just wanted to stay with the status quo,” Sileo said. “We’re pleased with what we have. There are no problems.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.